Victim of ( Judicial ) Greed

Monday, August 6, 2007

Friday, July 27, 2007

LAW FIRM OF FRANCO AND FRANCO

HOW DO YOU MISS THIS TARGET?

RAND(Y) / RANDI FRANCO

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 10 HOW GUILTY ARE THE FRANCOS

FRANCO'S OWN ATTORNEY SAID HE WAS DEAD

YOU DECIDE

Viewing the Records at the Somerset County Prosecutors Office

BY THE WAY WHO WAS THAT ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR???

NO ONE AT THE SCPO WILL DIVULGE WHO THAT MAN WAS

UNDER OPRA, The Somerset County Prosecutor's Office provided no exculpatory evidence. The Assitant Prosecutor simply decided not to prosecute. All statements on the record expressed that The Francos were responsible for committing "theft by deception" check conversion and cashing a fraudulent check.

There is also a obituary notice included in the PDF file, #7, Robert Groote,
he was the salesman that died after working at Villas on the Park in the basement of one of the units breathing in carbon monoxide and aggressive bacteria and mold. The second person that died was hank Portely, this death was was covered up also. Additionally, I had gotten Legionairres Disease and that was covered up.

There was a Gag Order also included, this group was operating as a criminal enterprise.

Quid Pro Quo, Robert Franco exchanged his fraudulent and "theft of honest services" as my representing attorney, to throw my case and be sure I lose this case, Judge Boyle's family already was doing business with Continental Properties and and other entities concerned with Degnan Boyle Prudential Realtors. As a presiding Judge, John M. Boyle also committed many criminal practices including taking payoff, theft of honest services, treason and fraud upon the court and the public, by not disclosing to potential buyers there was a health hazard that was being marketed to unsuspecting home buyers, for personal gain...this is a crime.

All matters and emails expressing complaints about the "Ray" children being abused and sexually explioted were exfoliated, there was no trace of my complaints to be seen. The evidence of my complaints going to Det. Sgt. Fodor and the Prosecutors Office is visable on the website: www.truthwins.info

This was nothing more than selective prosecution.

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Robert A Franco, ESQ. is a CHAMAELEON

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

The Somerset County Prosecutor

The SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECTOR DENIES
DUE PROCESS

The Somerset County Prosecutor's Office investgated the
Law Firm of Frano and Franco for 9 months

Monday, May 28, 2007

Sunday, May 27, 2007

AT LEAST NICK BISSELLE HAD A CONSCIENCE

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807

Somerset County Prosecutor's Office
40 North Bridge Street
Somerville, New Jersey 08876-1262
Telephone: 908 231 7100
Fax: SCPO.NET

Dear Sergeant Detective Fodor
and Wayne Forrest.

RE: Complaint (SCPO File #0609-2031) Robert A. Franco and Randi Franco, Esq.

I am responding to your certified letter dated May 23, 2007 which informed me that you received the two new pieces of evidence relating to the complaint (SCPO File #0609-2031). These two documents certified and confirmed that the check #143 Bank of America (4th payment), that was altered and the endorsed by Randi Franco and ultimately strategically cashed, was certainly tended for me.

You can see these certifications at: http://victimofjudicialgreed.blogspot.com/2007/05/certification-of-theft-et-tu-brutus.html

My Complaint is and continues to be:

(1) The check alteration; changing Cindy to Randy albeit she spells her name Randi.

(2) The endorsing of the check by Randi Franco as admitted by her husband Robert A Franco on the tape recording that you have in your possession.

(3) The recording of August 10, 2007 which we listened together, upon your hearing it, you sent me to the Bridgewater P.D. because you viewed it as a terroristic threat.

(4) The cashing of the check at the Somerset Valley Bank, in Somerset County.

(5) The cashing of the check which was implemented and masterminded by Mr. Franco, as he preyed on an elderly friend by deceiving him and leaving him as the culprit, by setting him up as a criminal offender, which Mr. Franco talked about on the same audio-tape recording that you and I listened to.

I see now, this event is labeled as a complaint, not an investigation, was it ever an investigation?

On Wednesday, May 23, I came to your office to find out who the Assistant Prosecutor is, who is involved in this matter, by seeing my file ( OPRA ), this answer for some obscure yet more than obvious reason is being withheld from me.

I also have called your office to report to the Crime Victim Program which was suggested by the custodian of Records for OPRA, Mary Ann Triacio after she listened to what had happened to me and how it continues to destroy my life, both financially and emotionally. Debby Mc Gowen, the Director of the Crime / Victim Program called me and left a message that she was going to confer with you about my coming in for an appointment, are you going to deny me counseling because the Assistant Prosecutor is refusing to move forward with a prosecution? I have called again and heard nothing.

Detective Fodor, at this point, I am being further VICTIMIZED, by your office. The Assistant Prosecutor whoever he or she is, has violated my due process, title 18 US 42 and has more than likely offended an IRS mandate. What is the purpose of letting an obvious criminal action, with many collateral mal-effects go without prosecution? Is it true, does Mr. Franco have the Prosecutor's Office handled, as Mr. Franco, himself has been stating? If this is factual, your Office must be investigated by an overseeing Law Enforcement Agency. This does happen, look back to the previous Prosecutor's history.

I am further aware that I am not the only victim in Somerset County. It appears that the Prosecutor's Office is aware of that two little girls, Ava and Talia Ray have been and continue to be abused both physically and sexually. Talia a victim of inordinate malice at Passages, a DYFUS Facility.
See http://truthwins.info/ and Ava in her own home.

It had been told to me, that Detective Jeannie Rabbie (sp) is looking into this matter, will this go without prosecution also? The complaints about this matter have been going on for quite a long time and so far, the day to day abuses have been occurring without intervention by your Office, The Somerset County Prosecutor.

I appreciate your directing me to send my letters and correspondence by certified mail but that puts a hardship on me, since I've had so much stolen from me and your office continues to ignore this. I will continue to email you and your Office because I believe that everyone should know what goes on in
Somerset County.

I know you receive my emails because the first email was answered by you, when I asked about a terroristic threat and you very duly sent the answer by mail with enclosures. If the emails are not read, then your office is further guilty of malfeasance, which would not be a further shock to the conscience.

Cordially.

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel

From: synjam@mac.com
Subject:
Date: May 27, 2007 8:49:10 AM EDT
To: fodor@co.somerset.nj.us, scpo.net@mac.com, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Inspectorgeneral@oig.state.nj.us, nancy.manteiga@usdoj.gov
Cc: ashaseagreen@yahoo.com, Ang1344@aol.com, ajohnson@academicplanet.com, aquabotics@yahoo.com, abc.news.magazines@abc.com, askconsumeraffairs@lps.state.nj.us, tculpepper@erols.com, christopher.hansen@nbc.com, Cgaal@sci.state.nj.us, cllevy@nytimes.com, cferrigno@dobi.state.nj.us, dot.comments@dot.gov, david@911truth.org, Dateline@NBC.com, pcastora@xpressamerica.net, Foxnewsonline@foxnews.com, hicaliber2002@aol.com, hamill@petehamill.com, hparkerson@suddenlink.net, HHSTips@oig.hhs.gov, iteam@news12.com, justice@judicialjustice.us, Info@JusticeOnTrial.org, info@cytec.com, investigations@911truth.org, paff@pobox.com, joseph@northjersey.com, kmatheson@app.com, LADISLAV@FASTMAIL.FM, PAKRAKA@aol.com, markos@northjersey.com, JMARTIN@starledger.com, mymark@gmail.com, ralph.marra@usdoj.gov, salvatorej@njdcj.org, tips@888577tips.org, beddi9@aol.com

Saturday, May 26, 2007

Robert Franco Makes Fool of Wayne Forrest

FRANCO GETS WHAT HE WANTS < THEN BOASTS HE'S UNTOUCHABLE

Dear Detective Sergeant Fodor,

I left several messages for you on your (908) 575 3419 phone number.
There are a more issues pending than the emergent issues that I initially came to
you with, early on.

When I first spoke to you with my friend Andrew Zimbler, I played an audio tape for you
containing a conversation between Norman Tauger and Robert A. Franco. Upon your
hearing this tape you instructed me to go to the Bridgewater Police Department to file a complaint
which you labeled a "terrorist threat". Which I did. From that point on, I have had a difficult time deciphering a threat,
from a terrorist threat, to veiled threat.

What I do know is, what I experience with my own two eyes:

A. I am receiving a type of threat through Norman Tauger concerning what Mr. Franco is capable of doing.
B. Noman had attepmpted to list his home in Boonton but Robert Franco was so threatening to the realtors,
they left in fear. Norman has promised to pay me the money that was stolen from me upon the sale of the house
but because of the wielding power from Mr. Franco and the comfort in his mind that he can control law enforcement,
he feels that he can intimidate and control the deceptive atmosphere.
C. I filed an Ethics Complaint against Robert Franco and the complaint is being stayed upon the finding of your
criminal investigation, leaving an errant attorney to continue to allegedly extort, threaten and prey on the vulnerable.

On another note, I have become aware of some questionable activities in Somerset County which I have witness from the
victim. The party is Talia Ray. I know that many complaints have been brought to your attention concerning
the Somerset County Courthouse and certain questionable activities perpetrated by Judges.
Whereas, I do respect your decision and accept your investigative ability, I understand that you do not have the final
decision in your pursuit of a criminal case. In regard to my claims about the former judge, Frank Gasiowaski, there is no
question in my mind that there was improper, extreme bias and inappropriate activity in the Case along with extortive
activity with the Sheriff's Department, Officer DeGuillio.

My two issues are filed presently at the back of my desk, regarding the Gasiorwarski and Franco matter, but the issue of Talia Ray
is at the forefront of my desk, my mind and my day.
The two daughter's of Larry Ray are victims of an evil, vengeful plan. If I were not living it now and had not witnessed
and been victimized myself from judicial corruption, I would believe I was reading a sick and perverted novel.

Instead of hedging, I will be direct, what will happen to Talia and Ava Ray, will this obscene negligence and horror continue?
Is someone at your office taking action to protect these two minors and amputate them from the control of the court? They want
to be with their father Larry Ray.

Respectfully, I await your kind response.

Cindy Feiler-Jampel

RPC 8.3 Reporting Professional Misconduct

(a) A lawyer having knowledge that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority.

(b) A lawyer having knowledge that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority.

(c) This RPC does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by RPC 1.6.

(d) Paragraph (a) of this Rule shall not apply to knowledge obtained as a result of participation in a Lawyers Assistance Program established by the Supreme Court and administered by the New Jersey State Bar Association, except as follows:

(i) if the effect of discovered ethics infractions on the practice of an impaired attorney is irremediable or poses a substantial and imminent threat to the interests of clients, then attorney volunteers, peer counselors, or program staff have a duty to disclose the infractions to the disciplinary authorities, and attorney volunteers have the obligation to apply immediately for the appointment of a conservator, who also has the obligation to report ethics infractions to disciplinary authorities, and

(ii) attorney volunteers or peer counselors assisting the impaired attorney in conjunction with is or her practice have the same responsibility as any other lawyer to deal candidly with clients, but that resonsibility does not include the duty to disclose voluntarily, without inquiry by the client, information of past violations that did not or do not pose a serious danger to clients.

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com

Somerset County Prosecutor’s Officer
40 North Bridge Street
P.O. Box 3000
Somerville, New Jersey 08876

April 30, 2007

Re: Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office Case File #0609-2031
(Robert and Randi Franco)

Dear Mr. Forrest and
Sergeant Detective Fodor,

I received your letter dated April 26, 2007, much to my discouragement and loss of faith, I understand that your Assistant Prosecutor did not find a criminal prosecution to be warranted concerning the alleged theft by Mr. and Mrs. Franco. I attempted to find out who the Assistant Prosecutor is, who made that determination and had there been an investigation. I believe there was not, since Norman Tauger, Larry Goldspiel nor I, were called in to the victims / witness advocacy. The letter I received is nothing more than a form letter, I received the same one concerning Judge Gasiorwaski another individual who managed to allegedly steal money from me through the guise of another attorney.

YOUR OFFICE HAS DENIED MY DUE PROCESS OF LAW

I am taking notice and I am aggrieved that you and your office have violated: TITLE 18
4. Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

In the late afternoon of April 30, I called the Prosecutor’s Office to find out who the Assistant Prosecutor was, but Sam, the person looking for the name, couldn’t even find the file/ name ”Robert Franco” listed. She asked me if it was a new claim or a juvenile matter. Was there an investigation?

I find it unfathomable that after the clear evidence of the person who directed the check to me, he giving a recorded statement saying that the check was meant for me and then changed to Randy Franco albeit she spells her name Randi ,along with the statement from Norman Tauter stating that Robert Franco set him up to cash the check and then my testimony along with an audio tape of Robert Franco himself addressing the change of the check to Randi, and finally Sergeant Fodor sending me to the Bridgewater P.D. to complain about Mr. Franco, stating a terrorist threat, resulting in the ultimate, the Assistant Prosecutor doesn’t think this rises to a crime, my understanding is diametrically opposing. Why did Sergeant Fodor waste the time of the Bridgewater P.D. if he felt there was no concern ? I think that is a crime in itself.

Wasting police time - section 5(2) Criminal Law Act 1967
(Archbold 28-224)
The offence of wasting police time is committed when a person
-1. causes any wasteful employment of the police by
-1. knowingly making to any person a false report orally or in writing tending to:
-1. show that an offence has been committed; or,
-1. give rise to apprehension for the safety of any persons or property; or,
-1. show that he has information material to any police inquiry.
It is a summary only offence carrying a maximum penalty of six months' imprisonment and/or a level 4 fine.
Proceedings may only be instituted by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions: s.5(3). Consent may be granted after charge but must be before a plea of guilty is entered or summary trial. Consent must be obtained before proceedings are started by way of summons.
Examples of the type of conduct appropriate for a charge of wasting police time include:
-1. false reports that a crime has been committed, which initiates a police investigation;
-1. the giving of false information to the police during the course of an existing investigation.
The public interest will favour a prosecution in any one of the following circumstances:-
-1. police resources have been diverted for a significant period (for example 10 hours);
-1. a substantial cost is incurred, for example a police helicopter is used or an expensive scientific examination undertaken;
-1. when the false report is particularly grave or malicious;
-1. considerable distress is caused to a person by the report;
-1. the accused knew, or ought to have known, that police resources were under particular strain or diverted from a particularly serious inquiry;
-1. there is significant premeditation in the making of the report;
-1. the report is persisted in, particularly in the face of challenge.
There are statutory offences which involve wasting police time and which should be used instead of section 5(2) when there is sufficient evidence. For example:-
-1. perpetrating a bomb hoax - s51(2) Criminal Law Act 1977;
-1. false alarms of fire - s.49 Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004;
-1. fraudulent insurance claims based on false reports of crime - deception.
There is an overlap between the offence of wasting police time and other, more serious offences. Regard must be had to the factors outlined in General Charging Principles, above in this chapter and Charging Practice for Public Justice Offences, above in this chapter, which help to identify conduct too serious to charge as wasting police time, when consideration should be given to a charge of perverting the course of justice

What rises to the level of a crime in Somerset
County?

I find it very questionable that several weeks prior to receiving Detective Fodor’s letter, Mr. Franco had been telling people he wasn’t even investigated. Why did he know this before I was notified? I am the complainant.

Unless there is a reversal of your initial decision, I feel that his matter should be brought into the public domain by what ever legitimate means there are available. As this is a matter of general domain/ public interest.

Please answer my requests for resolution.

Cordially,

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel

http://truthwins.info/

If you're an Attorney, like Robert Franco, this man's office issues a license to STEAL

Friday, May 25, 2007

Changing Medical Records to Cover Up Truth

Admission States Legionairre's Disease

Insurance Form states Admitted with Acute Bronchitis (code number changed to 4660)

Doctor Sharif's Signature was Forged

Concealing Legionairre's Disease at Villas on the Park

FILING AGAINST THE SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey
08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353

Government Records Council (GRC)
P.O. Box 819
Trenton, New Jersey, 08625

May 23, 2007

The Somerset County Prosecutors Office

Re: File# 0609-2031
Robert A Franco and Randi Kern Franco, Esq

Dear Government Records Council,

I receive a letter from Sergeant Detective John Fodor dated April 26, 2007 stating that the Assistant Prosecutor who reviewed the above stated matter did not determine that the claim warranted a prosecution. This investigation ensued for about nine months concerning an altered check that was cashed in Somerset County, threats directed at me and stolen cash. Sergeant Detective Foder directed me to the Bridgewater P.D. to file a complaint and I did as he directed.

To make reference to Detective Fodor’s letter, it was both vague and vacuous, a “cookie cutter” form letter. This letter was the result and outcome of a nine-month investigation, threats that were directed at me and a twenty thousand dollar theft. Is this what I pay taxes for?

I had followed up with request letters asking who the Assistant Prosecutor was and far more questions, that went unanswered. I believe something very nefarious went on with this matter, not with the Detective’s investigation but with the Assistant Prosecutor’s decision not to prosecute.

The element concerning this issue is not isolated to a theft but incorporating a fraudulent mortgage and a pattern of preying on the elderly. I am alleging for illicit reasons, the Assistant Prosecutor has been selectively deciding who to prosecute and who not to, similar to Mike Nifong who selected to create his own demise.

On May 1, 2007, I faxed to the Mary Ann Triaco, the lovely lady in charge of the records, my request at (908) 704 0750, the fax number which she gave to me. I followed up with a phone call to make sure she received it, she did. I called her about ten days later, she still being genuine and sweet, told me she was going to have the Assistant Prosecutor go through the file and remove selective documents. I heard nothing until I called on May 18, 2007 and then faxed over my third request. Ms. Tricio was sweet as ever and said I could look at the file on May 23, 2007.

Today, May 23, 2007 at about 10 AM I called and spoke to Ms. Tricio to remind her that I was going to be there at 11 AM. She sounded hesitant, but agreed. I left the house and drove to the Prosecutor’s Office. After waiting about 15 minutes, Ms. Tricio greeted me, very embarrassed and said that the Attorney, Bob Hawk did not go through the file and I could not see it. She also told me that she tried to call me, to tell me not to come. I asked her if I could see my own documents, she agreed. I scanned through what was there quickly and saw the envelopes with evidence that I provided.

I have been neither denied access to the records or granted access, I am in limbo and being toyed with, just as I had been with the pseudo and fraudulent denial to prosecute. I feel that the Assistant Prosecutor by denial to move forward to an indictment and conviction, is giving license to these attorneys, the Francos to extort unwarranted legal fees in order to keep a fraudulent mortgage up to date.

This entire investigation is an outrage and a violation of Due Process and Title 18. This lack of proper procedure should bring culpability upon the Assistant Prosecutor, who is being concealed and protected from the true perversion and convolution of this matter and prosecution.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Even Al Capone went down with this ONE

Dear IRS,

The matter outlined below was investigated by the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office, Somerville New Jersey.
The Assistant Prosecutor did not feel that this matter warranted a prosecution. I have limited knowledge of what
does merit an investigation or what is a "Red Flag", (since being a novice, I turn everything over to my Accountant, just like my legal matters over to an
Attorney) for the IRS, but I thought this may be one. I was advised that if I know of a matter like this, unless I report
it, I could be accused of aiding and abetting. I thought it might be similar to a Title 18, U.S.s 4 issue.

I noticed that the IRS has a specific email address designated for alerting fraud claims, concerning attorneys and
CPAs. I believe there is considerable suspicion by the general populace of people needing the employment of
attorneys and judges, particuarly of how their funds are handled but unless an entity like yours is willing to take
allegations we can not prove where financial fraud is going. Speaking for many, we would be happy to explore all
possibilities with you. I believe that the matter outlined below is very glaring but other issues are more nefarious,
however, should your office need further information I will be happy to supply it.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Feiler- Jampel

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
(908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com

I am reporting Robert A. Franco Esq. and Randi Kern Franco Esq. and the Firm of Franco and Franco from 6 Bayer Lane Boonton Township, ( their office is in Morristown) New Jersey for allegedly stealing a total of $20,000 from me. In December of 2004, Robert Franco arranged a loan to another of his clients. Mr. Franco said he would write up the terms but he failed to. I wrote up a quick outline of the loan and wrote in the memo of the check that this loan was referred by Robert Franco, Esq.

The borrower had mailed two or three checks to me during the appropriate time but was in default for the full amount. I had called Mr. Tauger a friend of the borrowers and of Mr. Franco and he became sympathetic and forthcoming with information about the repayment.
The borrower, Larry Goldspeil had defaulted with the loan and spoke with Mr. Tauger and me, admitting that the he had paid back several thousand dollar to me by entrusting cash to RobertFranco, $15,000 instructing him to give it to me in repayment for the loan. Mr. Franco said he was going to use it, then immediately replace it and give to the rightful collector, me.

On an audio tape, Mr. Franco claimed that the cash was owed to him for "Attorney Fees", yet no bill was issued. Furthermore, the client was from New York and Mr. Franco is not licensed in New York. In retrospect, I, having been a client of the Francos for several years, am suddenly thinking that possibly since all my legal matters were insufficiently\handled and yet the lifestyle of the Franco seem to elevate to homes for a million dollars plus, and the claims by Mr. Franco was that a Doctor who paid him $60,000 and I were his biggest paying clients, I'm wondering how the Francos managed to support their lifestyle. I hope my impression is wrong, that the illicit taking of my repayment of funds was reported to the IRS, but then if it were, Mr. Franco is guilty of stealing my money, which he claims he did not do. I don't think he can have it both ways.

In the absence of the clear accounting statement that I had been requesting for some time, the borrower and I decided to obtain an accounting of checks, since he informed me the cash was pilfered by Mr. Franco. The borrower had discovered that a check designated to me for five thousand dollars was made payable to CINDY and then written over CINDY was RANDY and endorsed by RANDI FRANCO and then cashed by a third party, Norman Tauger. The check was drawn from a Bank America Account, dated May 6, 2005, consistent with the other checks payable to me. I have copies of the all the checks, bothe the altered and 3 previous checks proving that each check was inscribed only Cindy and it was necessary for me to inset my surname.

I also have Mr. Franco on audiotape saying that Randi signed the back of the check and then Mr. Franco went on to threaten me. I filed a complaint at the Bridgewater P.D.

I have two affidavits one from Mr. Goldspeil and the other from Mr. Tauger supporting the money was meant for me.
I would like to meet with someone to present evidence.

Government Reck-ords Council

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey
08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353

Government Records Council (GRC)
P.O. Box 819
Trenton, New Jersey, 08625

May 23, 2007

The Somerset County Prosecutor's Office

Re: File# 0609-2031
Robert A Franco and Randi Kern Franco, Esq

Dear Government Records Council,

I received a letter from Sergeant Detective John Fodor dated April 26, 2007 stating that the Assistant Prosecutor who reviewed the above stated matter did not determine that the claim warranted a prosecution. This investigation ensued for about nine months concerning an altered check that was cashed in Somerset County, threats directed at me and stolen cash. Sergeant Detective Foder directed me to the Bridgewater P.D. to file a complaint and I did, as he directed.

To make reference to Detective Fodor’s letter, it was both vague and vacuous, a “cookie cutter” form letter. This letter was the result and outcome of a nine-month investigation into my former Attorney, Robert A Franco setting forth an immediate threat, a continuation of veiled threats, confirmation of Franco taking the money, stated by two key witnesses, Mr. Franco himself on tape saying Cindy was changed to Randy, Randi signed the back of an altered check and a twenty thousand dollar theft in total. Is this what I pay taxes for, a rouse?

I had followed up with request letters asking who the Assistant Prosecutor was and far more questions, that went unanswered. I believe something very nefarious went on with this matter, not necessarily with the Detective’s investigation but with the Assistant Prosecutor’s decision not to prosecute.

The element concerning this issue is not isolated to a theft but incorporating a fraudulent mortgage and a pattern of preying on the elderly. I am alleging for illicit reasons, the Assistant Prosecutor has been selectively deciding who to prosecute and who not to, similar to Mike Nifong who "selected" to create his own demise.

On May 1, 2007, I faxed to the Mary Ann Triaco, the lovely lady in charge of the records, my request at (908) 704 0750, the fax number which she gave to me. I followed up with a phone call to make sure she received it, she did. I called her about ten days later, she still being genuine and sweet, told me she was going to have the Assistant Prosecutor go through the file and remove selective documents. I heard nothing until I called on May 18, 2007 and then faxed over my third request. Ms. Tricio was sweet as ever and said I could look at the file on May 23, 2007.

Today, May 23, 2007 at about 10 AM I called and spoke to Ms. Triacio to remind her that I was going to be there at 11 AM. She sounded hesitant, but agreed. I left the house and drove to the Prosecutor’s Office. After waiting about 15 minutes, Ms. Tricio greeted me, very embarrassed and said that the Attorney, Bob Hawk did not go through the file and I could not see it. She also told me that she tried to call me, to tell me not to come. I asked her if I could see my own documents, she agreed. I scanned through what was there quickly and saw the envelopes with evidence that I provided but did not see any of the emails that were sent concerning a very serious matter of child abuse.

I have been neither denied access to the records or granted access, I am in limbo and being toyed with, just as I had been with the pseudo and fraudulent denial to prosecute. I feel that the Assistant Prosecutor by denying to move forward to an indictment and conviction, is giving license to these attorneys, the Francos to extort unwarranted legal fees in order to keep a fraudulent mortgage up to date, see: //victimofjudicialgreed.blogspot.com/2007/05/blog-post_6339.html

This entire investigation is an outrage and a violation of Due Process and Title 18. The lack of proper procedure should bring culpability upon the Assistant Prosecutor, who is being concealed and protected from me, the victim who is suffering from the perpetuation of fraud and criminal activities. Late in the afternoon, I had called to make an appointment to see Debbie Mc Gawen, from the Crime Victim Unit, she has not returned my call, what shall I expect next?

Sincerely,

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel

Ms. Tricio

Ms. Tricio's vioce mail
You received a new message in your Optimum Voice
voicemail box.

Date/Time of Call: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 10:26AM
EDT
Calling Number: 908-231-0557
Message Length: 13 seconds
Message Priority: Normal

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Ber-Gain County

http://njjudiciary.blogspot.com/search?q=&x=35&y=10

BYE, BYE TRUST ACCOUNT!

From: andrew.zimbler@btopenworld.com
Subject: RE: Seeking Confirmation of Balance of Funds held on my behalf, etc.
Date: August 20, 2005 9:42:50 AM EDT
To: ranfranc@optonline.net

Dear Randi,

Thank you for getting back to me so rapidly and please forgive the brevity
of this quick response but I am caught up in some work that really requires
my undivided attention.

Nevertheless, PLEASE let Cindy have the check ASAP.

I would look forward to hearing from Bob tomorrow but, as I have certain
family obligations which continue to be taking my time, it's probably best
if I call him.

In the meantime, I hope that you all have a great day.

Kind regards,

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: Randi Franco [mailto:ranfranc@optonline.net]
Sent: 20 August 2005 14:31
To: Andrew Zimbler
Subject: Re: Seeking Confirmation of Balance of Funds held on my behalf,
etc.

Dear Andrew,

Thank you for your e-mail and I hope all is well with you. Bob and I
have been discussing that we were surprised that we have not received any
e-mails from you in a few weeks, so your message today was very welcomed.

As is happens, Bob is speaking with Cindy right now. She has let us
know about Lavaba's illness, which I assume she has told you about. She
also is asking for reimbursement for your recent hotel stay in New Jersey,
which she says is $830.00.
Your present balance in our trust account, before deducting the $830.00, is
$6,310.92. Do I have your authorization to give Cindy a check for $830.00?
She would like to get the check from us tomorrow. Please let me know ASAP.

Bob and I, and our boys, have to go to New York City today for a bridal
shower but we will be home all day tomorrow. He has been extraordinarily
busy with legal work and will be working tomorrow, but he will definitely
call you. He apologizes for not calling sooner, but he just has not had
much time. He looks forward to speaking with you on Sunday. What is a good
time for you?

I look forward to your reply. Have a wonderful day.

Best wishes,

Randi Franco
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Zimbler"
To:
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Seeking Confirmation of Balance of Funds held on my behalf,
etc.

Franco didn't want to NOE

John Noe
3250 Sherwood Ridge Drive
Powhatan, VA.23139
(804) 598-6428

December 12, 2006

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

Ms.Cindy Jampel

My name is John Noe. I became acquainted with Ms.Jampel about ten years ago. I had read
a newspaper story in which she was referred to as demonstrating against a developer who
had put up a condominium site. Due to builder defects, the condominium suffered with
proliferated mold. After becoming friends with Ms.Jampel, I have seen her suffer with a lot of
health problems which were associated with this mold and the builder defects.

I was struck by Ms.Jampel's ability to understand complex issues and laws concerning
building codes and the environment. At the time I met Ms.Jampel, I was conducting an
investigation into the building industry and how it resulted in environmental contamination
throughout New Jersey. My primary focus was to investigate the investigators and various
branches of State Government. I totally understand Ms.Jampel's frustration when dealing
with a disfunctional system. I, together with many people with whom I have worked,
including members of the State Commission of Investigation, have been targets of animosity.

I conducted extensive research on Ms.Jampel's case and conclude that Ms.Jampel is one
of the brightest stars for the rule of law and a paragon of honesty and integrity. Ms.Jampel
has helped me far more that any official. She should be admired, not chastized, for her
good work. My main concern is the motive of anyone who questions the mental status of
a champion for the truth.

I can understand why John M.Boyle, a former judge, would want to silence Ms.Jampel. He
is clearly intimidated by her ability to expose the truth, as is Mr.Bob Franco. Mr.Franco was
Ms.Jampel's attorney. I always had my doubts about his ability to align himself with his
client, but - in time - Mr.Franco made it very clear that he represented only himself.

This conclusion is based on a lawsuit unrelated to Ms.Jampel's case. Mr.Franco represented
a client who had an environmental and conflict of interest case. I initialized, was the sole
investigator and had an entire file involving this case. Mr.Franco had absolutely no interest in
hearing any facts or information I had regarding the matter.

If you have any questions concerning this letter, or need clarification on any point, please
do not hesitate to contact the writer.

Yours faithfully,

John J. Noe

Monday, May 21, 2007

Robin Cohen

Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey, 08807
Telephone: (908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com

District X Ethics Committee
23 Cattano Avenue
Morristown, New Jersey 07960
Telephone (973) 285 1444

RE: Law firm of Franco and Franco

Docket No.
X-060089E

March 1, 2007

Dear Mr. Knapp,

Please allow this letter to serve as follow-up to the
numerous letters and phone calls involving my
complaint about the Law Firm of Franco and Franco,
both individually and collectively.

Several months ago, you and I had a brief
conversation, I on my cell phone and you from your
office, which you were about to leave due to an
appointment. I had difficulty hearing you and
unfortunately, because you were leaving your office,
you were unable to call me back on my home phone, so I
could hear more clearly what your intentions were
about the status of my “Grievance Complaint”.

I believe to my best knowledge, you had said you were
moving forward but were going to contact the Somerset
County Prosecutor’s Office to get a clearer
understanding of the criminal investigation against
Robert and Randi Franco and possibly their Law Firm
Franco and Franco. I am still waiting to receive
correspondence from you. Please respond to my question
in letter form, is this matter stayed for this time,
are you investigating further and have you contacted
the Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office?

I have learned from many sources that Robert Franco
has acted adverse toward several of his clients’ best
interest. Unbeknownst to him, through a common
acquaintance, (who is also victimized by the Francos)
I had been introduced to clients and former clients.
Almost unanimously, these clients have asked me about
regaining their funds, which were paid to the Law Firm
of Franco and Franco under the guise of fees.

Mr. Franco’s smooth and cunning practice of gaining
fees has been consistent amongst several of the
clients that have called me. He seems to sweet talk
the potential client into giving him fees but does not
instruct them sign a retainer at that time. He seems
to never bill them or present an accounting of his
work. He did this to me back to the late 1990s when I
was completely naive and trusting. As a matter or
fact, Mr. Franco has a svengali like personality and
has the ability to smile, sweet talk a client and
brutalize them at the same time.

Mr. and Mrs. Franco have used opportunities from time
to time to misguide clients, then, in return, the
clients had to turn to either Mr. or Mrs. Franco for
further legal direction, as the billable time and fees
accrue.

Mr. Franco has talked about the incident concerning
the arrests in Bergen County, but the Bergen County
Detectives already have in their possession audio
taped recordings of Mr. Franco giving me poor and
misleading advice. It appears, he had a vested
financial interest already in mind, as he had given me
adverse and unlawful direction, leaving me vulnerable
to his predatory practices. Either he doesn’t know
what he is doing or he is out right malicious.

I have consulted with at least three criminal defense
attorneys who have told me there are rules concerning
lawyers giving unethical and unlawful advice. I think
perhaps, there may exist a Supreme Court Rule about
attorneys putting clients in imminent
harm.

The Ethics Committee should pursue an investigation
regardless of an impending criminal investigation or
else the Ethics Committee will appear culpable in not
curtailing an unethical and runaway attorney from
practicing law. A criminal investigation could take
years, leaving a wonton attorney to endanger the
public.

Although harm comes from different areas, in this
case, the over the top “life of luxury” and immediate
need for money has forced the Francos to obtain fees
though fraud and deceit.

Please advise if you have contacted the Somerset
County Prosecutor’s Office.

Sincerely,

C/c Attorney General Stuart Rabner

Governor Jon Corzine