http://truthwins.info/
A TRIBUTE TO HEROIC FRIENDS, LARRY, TALIA AND LITTLE AVA
Saturday, May 19, 2007
http://truthwins.info/
HONORABLE JUDGE JOHN BOYLE
Cindy Jampel
PO box 153
Berkeley Heights, New Jersey 07922
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
970 Broad Street
Suite 700
Newark, New Jersey 07102
Christopher Christie
Investigator Beet
Nancy Manteiga
RE: Former Judge John M. Boyle Union County Courthouse, Elizabeth, NJ
I am alleging that subsequent to former Judge John M. Boyle's appearance on the Fox News Network March 11, 2005, "It's Your World with Neil Cavuto", (and my direction to our website containing transcripts, falsified documents, cancelled checks as payoff and proof of John M. Boyle operating as a criminal enterprise), our website was hacked and this information was removed. I was able to trace that the website was entered at 00.42 AM and the intruders were from Australia, making the time an afternoon hour in Australia. I was able to investigate further to find the hackers have an agreement with some judicial format as well as other sites containing child pornography.
It has been previously reported to your office that Former Judge Boyle boasted about his relationship with organized crime as viewed on a made for TV video. His latest appearance on Fox News outlined mistruths of threats that were made against him. We have well documented evidence that John Boyle has been crying wolf to law enforcement about threats. He is disingenuous and most irregular as a presiding judge. His family stood to have financial gain as framed with in his rulings at the expense of litigants.
Please investigate this complaint. I would like an appointment to present this information in person.
Sincerely,
Cindy Jampel
Robert Franco Admits Wife, Randi endorced the Check on TAPE
AUDIO TAPE WILL BE PROVIDED ON WWW.CRROL.ORG
Acting Governor Richard Codey
Dear Honorable Governor , Richard Codey
May 7, 2007
Attached is a letter that was sent to the Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office. The Prosecutor’s Office had been investigating a clear and unequivocal theft of $20,000 by my former attorney, Robert A. Franco and his wife, Randi Franco, Esq.
There is an audio tape of the attorney himself talking about how a check meant for me was altered and his wife’s name was put on it obliterating and altering mine and then cashed. The attorney kept the money and there was a witness.
The prosecutor has a copy of the check and clear and convincing evidence concerning the theft and the Francos preying on the elderly. Robert Franco has been telling people that he got the investigation shut down because he has connections with the prosecutor’s office.
This crime both from the Attorneys, Robert and Randi Franco and the Prosecutor’s Office need to be investigated by the Attorney General’s Office, I have already filed with the Ethic’s Committee.
Thank you for you kind attention in this matter,
Sincerely,
Cynthia Feiler- Jampel
Robert Franco Claiming the Courts are UNJUST
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com
Somerset County Prosecutor’s Officer
40 North Bridge Street
P.O. Box 3000
Somerville, New Jersey 08876
April 30, 2007
Re: Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office Case File #0609-2031
(Robert and Randi Franco)
Dear Mr. Forrest and
Sergeant Detective Fodor,
I received your letter dated April 26, 2007, much to my discouragement and loss of faith, I understand that your Assistant Prosecutor did not find a criminal prosecution to be warranted concerning the alleged theft by Mr. and Mrs. Franco. I attempted to find out who the Assistant Prosecutor is, who made that determination and had there been an investigation. I believe there was not, since Norman Tauger, Larry Goldspiel nor I, were called in to the victims / witness advocacy. The letter I received is nothing more than a form letter, I received the same one concerning Judge Gasiorwaski another individual who managed to allegedly steal money from me through the guise of another attorney.
YOUR OFFICE HAS DENIED MY DUE PROCESS OF LAW
I am taking notice and I am aggrieved that you and your office have violated: TITLE 18
4. Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
In the late afternoon of April 30, I called the Prosecutor’s Office to find out who the Assistant Prosecutor was, but Sam, the person looking for the name, couldn’t even find the file/ name ”Robert Franco” listed. She asked me if it was a new claim or a juvenile matter. Was there an investigation?
I find it unfathomable that after the clear evidence of the person who directed the check to me, he giving a recorded statement saying that the check was meant for me and then changed to Randy Franco albeit she spells her name Randi ,along with the statement from Norman Tauter stating that Robert Franco set him up to cash the check and then my testimony along with an audio tape of Robert Franco himself addressing the change of the check to Randi, and finally Sergeant Fodor sending me to the Bridgewater P.D. to complain about Mr. Franco, stating a terrorist threat, resulting in the ultimate, the Assistant Prosecutor doesn’t think this rises to a crime, my understanding is diametrically opposing. Why did Sergeant Fodor waste the time of the Bridgewater P.D. if he felt there was no concern ? I think that is a crime in itself.
Wasting police time - section 5(2) Criminal Law Act 1967
(Archbold 28-224)
The offence of wasting police time is committed when a person
0. causes any wasteful employment of the police by
0. knowingly making to any person a false report orally or in writing tending to:
0. show that an offence has been committed; or,
0. give rise to apprehension for the safety of any persons or property; or,
0. show that he has information material to any police inquiry.
It is a summary only offence carrying a maximum penalty of six months' imprisonment and/or a level 4 fine.
Proceedings may only be instituted by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions: s.5(3). Consent may be granted after charge but must be before a plea of guilty is entered or summary trial. Consent must be obtained before proceedings are started by way of summons.
Examples of the type of conduct appropriate for a charge of wasting police time include:
0. false reports that a crime has been committed, which initiates a police investigation;
0. the giving of false information to the police during the course of an existing investigation.
The public interest will favour a prosecution in any one of the following circumstances:-
0. police resources have been diverted for a significant period (for example 10 hours);
0. a substantial cost is incurred, for example a police helicopter is used or an expensive scientific examination undertaken;
0. when the false report is particularly grave or malicious;
0. considerable distress is caused to a person by the report;
0. the accused knew, or ought to have known, that police resources were under particular strain or diverted from a particularly serious inquiry;
0. there is significant premeditation in the making of the report;
0. the report is persisted in, particularly in the face of challenge.
There are statutory offences which involve wasting police time and which should be used instead of section 5(2) when there is sufficient evidence. For example:-
0. perpetrating a bomb hoax - s51(2) Criminal Law Act 1977;
0. false alarms of fire - s.49 Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004;
0. fraudulent insurance claims based on false reports of crime - deception.
There is an overlap between the offence of wasting police time and other, more serious offences. Regard must be had to the factors outlined in General Charging Principles, above in this chapter and Charging Practice for Public Justice Offences, above in this chapter, which help to identify conduct too serious to charge as wasting police time, when consideration should be given to a charge of perverting the course of justice
What rises to the level of a crime in Somerset
County?
I find it very questionable that several weeks prior to receiving Detective Fodor’s letter, Mr. Franco had been telling people he wasn’t even investigated. Why did he know this before I was notified? I am the complainant.
Unless there is a reversal of your initial decision, I feel that his matter should be brought into the public domain by what ever legitimate means there are available. As this is a matter of general domain/ public interest.
Please answer my requests for resolution.
Cordially,
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
FRANCO'S BUSINESS PRACTICES
/>
I became aware of Robert Franco and the Firm of Franco and Franco during a civil matter when Mr. Franco represented a co-defendant, while I was represented by a former friend and colleague of the Francos. The matter took some unusual turns, resulting in Mr. Franco representing me in a Plenary Hearing. Mr. Franco entered as representing me with the Plenary Hearing with no retainer or agreement, he simply positioned himself to scare me and begin his mission of smoke and mirrors. The “Court entered a “Settlement”, which I was not in agreement with and furthermore, there was no existing settlement or settlement papers.
Mr. Franco called me shortly after the settlement hearing and advised me that while he was in chambers representing the co-defendant, he witnessed a “sham” perpetrated against me, and he knew, that in truth, I did not settle the matter. I believed Mr. Franco and when he told me that I needed to appeal.
1.Mr. Franco said he would represent me on Appeal for a twenty five percent
contingent fee, but later charged me twenty five thousand dollars for preparing and filing
the Appeal.(Attachment A). Mr. Franco had entered orders into the Appeal which
were unsigned. The substantive elements were questionable and Mr. Franco failed to
appeal erroneous fees that I was ordered to pay.
These orders should have been appealed but were not. Mr. Franco never protected my
finances.
2.Sometime early in the year 2001, Mr. Franco, and then Mrs. Franco called me
requesting a short term loan for ten thousand dollars. I wired the money into their
personal account. They did not pay me back. Fortunately, I was friendly with another
client, Steven Fine, who was billed by Franco and Franco for six thousand dollars, who
paid me a portion of the Franco's debt, leaving a remaining debt of four thousand
dollars, which I never received.
. In December of 2004, Robert Franco arranged a loan to another of his clients. I was apprehensive but Mr. Franco assured me this was an iron clad loan for six months, the borrower was substantial and owned multiple properties (the property had a pending sale which I was to be paid from). Mr. Franco said he would write up the terms but he failed to. I wrote up a quick outline of the loan and wrote in the memo of the check that this loan was referred by Robert Franco. Mr. Franco never provided either me or the “borrower” with a drafted agreement or a copy of the insurance policy, yet he was immediately paid twenty five hundred dollars, cash. He issued no receipt or bill.
The “borrower” had mailed two or three checks to me during the appropriate time but was in default for the full amount. I had called Mr. Tauger and he became sympathetic and forthcoming with information about the repayment. He and I would have several conversations daily. Norman Tauger and Mr. Franco were aware that because of so many unfortunate situations, I had become distrusting and created a back-up system of recording conversations.
The information he had expressed was the Francos had serious financial challenges and he was helping them out.
The borrower, Larry Goldspeil had defaulted with the loan and spoke with Mr. Tauger and me, admitting that the he had paid back several thousand dollar to me by entrusting cash to Robert Franco, instructing him to give it to me in repayment for the loan. Mr. Franco said he was going to use it, then immediately replace it and give to the rightful collector, me.
In the absence of the clear accounting statement that I had been requesting for some time, the borrower and I decided to obtain an accounting of checks, since he informed me the cash was pilfered by Mr. Franco. The borrower had discovered that a check designated to me for five thousand dollars was made payable to CINDY and then written over CINDY was RANDY and endorsed by RANDI FRANCO and then cashed by a third party, Norman Tauger. The check was drawn from a Bank America Account, dated May 6, 2005, consistent with the other checks payable to me. I have copies of the other checks proving that each check was inscribed only “Cindy” and it was necessary for me to inset my surname.
Mr. Goldspeil and Norman Tauger befriended me and guaranteed payment to me
upon the sale of the Mr. Goldspeil's home. I was informed by each and both of them that
“the sale”was going to take place shortly after the new year but fell through. The escrow
money needed to be returned to the buyer, but was delayed because the Francos
withdrew seven thousand dollars from the escrow account money, held for the”
borrower”, in order for the Francos to pay their mortgage. Hence, I was still not paid.
On or about February 24, the Mr. Tauger sent a check to replace the seven thousand
dollars used by the Francos for personal use.
As time elapsed, I had began to mistrust Mr. Franco and I decided to take a closer look
into the cases he had represented . I checked into the contingency case where I
swallowed glass after drinking directly from a bottle of Arizona Ice Tea. My hospital
records and bill were never entered as evidence, nor were the answers to the
Interrogatories. I saw that several defendants settled the case and that my case was
dismissed for failure to answer the Interrogatories.
I also saw there was an “arbitration award” but, since the
court folder was exfoliated, I could not ascertain how much it was. I was not permitted
to be in the closed door arbitration and when Mr. Franco came out, he simply said we
lost. In my ignorance, I asked him to appeal but he said it was over. I later found the
docket sheet said needs “Trail De Novo”. Mr. Franco took this case an a verbal one third
contingency. He later confided in Norman Tauger that he knew he would never win this
case. There was no bill or time sheet, however, I much later in 2006 went to the
courthouse to look though the file and found one settlement after another. I now feel that
Mr. Franco threw my case for an alleged pay-off from the defendants. I request all of the
Franco's bank accounts to be produced for an account of their income as compared to
timing of settlement and attorney work product.
Mr. Franco filed another complaint against a physician who publicly profiled my health
without a release. The case was dismissed for failure to notice the State of a “Torte
Claim”. Again, I feel the same, was there an alleged pay-off?
There were several “contingency cases”,
all lost, yet good cases.
.
In November of 2005, I was arrested in Bergen County due to a matter where I was set-up by our former business partner. Prior to any action I took, I asked Mr. Franco if what I was doing was legal. Mr. Franco in short said yes. He knew that I had no money after what I had been through regarding the Goldspiel loan and Mr. Franco's alleged theft. Mr. Franco in the presence of two witness told me to borrow forty thousand dollars from a relative and give him twenty. Mr. Franco had no retainer agreement with me for representation but he knew I was needed representation for a non-guilty plea. Our former business partner paid Mr. Franco in cash for all he had done. Mr. Franco never
gave Mr. Mallison a receipt or bill. There is evidence of this with the Bergen County Prosecutor.
Mr. Franco's billing process is flawed and inappropriate, it appears he never bills his clients appropriately and therefore his clients have no tracking or evidence of payment. This was additionally told to me by many clients.
MORE INSANITY
'Courthouses Are Magnets for Problems'
Friday, March 11, 2005
NEW YORK — In Atlanta, someone grabs a gun from a deputy and kills not only a judge presiding over his case but the deputy and a court stenographer. In Chicago, someone else gets into a judge’s home and kills her husband and mother.
These murders – Friday’s violence in Atlanta in Judge Rowland Barnes (search) courtroom and the Feb. 28 killings of Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow's (search) family members — are rare, but the threats are not.
“We have to worry about the safety of the judge, the court reporter, the defense lawyer, the prosecutor,” said FOX News’ Greta Van Susteren. “Courthouses are magnets for problems. That’s why you go to court – because you have a problem.”
The U.S. Marshals Service, which tackles security for federal judges and officers of the court, says the potential danger for judges and other court personnel is a very real problem.
The service keeps statistics on more than 2000 judges, prosecutors and federal defenders. Every year, it receives more than 700 threats against federal judges. A small number — about 20 judges and prosecutors — have a protection detail and, of those, a dozen require around-the-clock security.
According to the Marshals Service, more than 277,000 banned items were confiscated at courts last year. These items included guns and knives.
The suspect in the Atlanta case, Brian Nichols (search), was found to have had a hand-made knife hidden his shoe after a court appearance on Wednesday. Authorities are not sure how he got it or what he intended to do with it.
But he was allowed to return to court on Friday and was being escorted to a court room by a lone female deputy when he managed to take her gun. Armed with the deputy's gun, authorities believe Nichols entered Judge Barnes' courtroom and held law enforcement officers there at bay. He then shot Barnes and the clerk, both of whom died in the courtroom. The other deputy who died was shot as Nichols was fleeing the courthouse, officials said.
The chain of events led a number of legal analysts and former judges or court officials to question how efficient the security was at the Fulton County Courthouse (search). Why was it that an accused violent rapist was being escorted by only one deputy? How could the suspect get the gun away from the deputy?
"Clearly something broke down in the system," said Howard Safir, a former New York City police commissioner. "One thing you never see in a federal courthouse is an exposed weapon."
Safir said state courts should consider keeping bailiffs and other armed court personnel in plain clothes. That prevents suspects from knowing exactly where their weapons are concealed or from knowing who the officers are.
“Well-trained procedures that are in palce are what prevents this kind of a tragedy," Safir said.
Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, security in courthouses around the nation has been strengthened. Courts have more perimeter security and more machines to screen courthouse visitors for guns. But the National Center for State Courts reports the degree to which these security procedures are followed can vary from court to court.
The last time a federal judge was killed was in 1989. U.S. Appeals Court Judge Robert Vance died after opening a mail bomb sent by a man who was angry that his conviction for possessing a pipe bomb had not been overturned.
Security officials say the case that first changed attitudes about security involved the father of actor Woody Harrelson (search). In 1979, Judge John Wood was shot by a sniper outside his home in San Antonio, Texas. Harrelson’s father, Charles Voyde Harrelson, was later convicted for the crime.
Retired Judge Andrew P. Napolitano, FOX News’ senior judicial analyst, said that judges need to be prepared for the worst. Judges can carry sidearms if they feel the need and can also request 24-hour security if they feel threatened. Plus, courts already have significant security procedures.
“But there is a belief [among judges] that ‘they’re not going to come after me. I’m just doing my job.’ … I myself fell susceptible to that and became oblivious to security problems. It’s easy to fall into that trap. … What happened today will change security across the country.”
Retired Judge John M. Boyle, who presided over a courtroom in Union County, N.J., said he had been faced with threats during his time on the bench. “You’re not sure whether to take these people seriously or not. That’s part of the problem. A lot of these people are cracks,” he said.
“I think I became a little tougher,” Boyle told FOX News. “You take this with the job, it’s part of the territory.”
FOX News' Catherine Herridge and J. Jennings Moss contributed to this report.
Victim of (JUDICIALl) Greed
IS BEING AN AWARE WITNESS, AS AN ATTORNEY TO AN ALLEGED FRAUDULENT MORTGAGE PUNISHABLE BY PRISON, PARTICULARLY IF THE ATTORNEY WAS TO BENEFIT BY RESIDING IN THE HOME?
WATCH FOR MRS. RANDI FRANCO'S AND ROBERT A. FRANO'S LAW SUIT TO BE POSTED...THEY CAN SUE THEMSELVES FOR
BEING AN:
OR
.jpg)
DOUBLE CLICK ON ALL DOCUMENTS
THIS IS A STORY OF MY LITTLE BROTHER'S LOVE FOR ME......UNTIL HE KILLED MY INNOSENCE AND TRUST WITH HIS LUSTFUL
ROMANCE WITH POWER AND GREED.....
IT ALL BEGAN WITH.................
JUDGE JOHN M. BOYLE'S, UNION COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,
"DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE"
MONEY > LIFE
Cindy Feiler-Jampel
PO Box 153
Berkeley Heights, New Jersey 07922
Phone: (9008) 393 9353
Regarding: Misconduct at the Union County Courthouse
The issue of judicial corruption started from a condo complex in Berkeley Heights, Union County, called “Villas on the Park”. In August of 1996, four families moved in, three families in one building and one in an adjacent building. Within two weeks we saw proliferated mold growth along our floorboards and up the walls. (I have video tapes, letters from the Bureau of Codes and Regulatory Affairs, letters from The State and local Health Departments, pictures, microbiologists reports from my expert and the builder’s expert, and many more documents of proof). The builder never denied the mold and defects in the condos, however he filed a "ten million dollar" law suit against us for slander. This was a frivolous law suit which was purely a scare tactic. I will come back to this issue as we go further.
The four families, I will call us the “residents”, hired an attorney, who obtained RK Environmentalists to do testing. The microbiologist’s testing showed the levels of mold and bacteria to be so high, the homes were virtually uninhabitable. We, the residents asked the builder to rescind the contracts and return our money. He refused. The builder was continuing to merchandise his condos and did not disclose the environmental conditions to prospective buyers. Disclosure, in real-estate law, is mandated. The most important issue of why so many legal and ethical irregularities took place, was that the developer still had about sixty three more dwellings to sell.
Since the builder would not refund our money and we could not live in our homes, where we had existing mortgages which we were obligated to pay, we started to picket in an effort to stop other families from falling into the same situation as we were in. We had obtained permits from the police department to protest, and we kept our picketing very orderly. The only issue we presented was the report from RK Environmentalists.
Eventually, the other three families decided to settle with the builder at a sizable loss and a gag order. I did not settle since my losses were far greater than the other residents and the gag order was unethical and a means to continue to sell these uninhabitable homes.
I had contracted Legionnaires Disease from my home.
I hired a new attorney and we filed a lawsuit for consumer fraud in the law division with a jury demand on February 6, 1997,. The builder filed a frivolous law suit February 11,1997 in Chancery Court, suing us for ten million dollars.( Chancery is not a court for large money claims) The builder filed FIVE days after we did. The judge started a letter writing campaign stating that we cannot transfer to the law division and cannot have a jury trial. This was a tactic to distract us from the prevailing suit that was appropriately filed in the law division.
The assignment judge, Judge Beglin protected the Chancery Court Judge, John M. Boyle's falsified sentiments and later obliterated the Law Division claim. Since my attorney, who was an immature professional believed the words of Judge Boyle that the case didn’t exist, Mr Jerchower, Esq. never checked on it.
I was repeatedly summoned into court for erroneous violations. With each hearing I was left paying the builders attorney fees, adding to about twenty thousand dollars. This was another sham to usurp my finances so that I would go away.
I discovered the Judge’s family has several real-estate concerns and had a history with my builder. The judge’s family owns Degnan Boyle Prudential Real Estate, Boyle Associates, Boyle Commercial Realtors and more, including several Best Western Motels, one of which is located in Westfield, NJ and had a severe mold problem. Parenthetically, the developer's attorney firm had a strong relationship with the judge and according to a goggle search, someone had clerked for the judge.
The real-estate offices had several listings of the builder’s properties. The Judge’s family stood to have financial gain through the sales of this builders products. My attorney asked the judge to recuse himself on several occasions, but the judge refused. Judge Boyle would have commentary about how he had no bias towards me and no ulterior motive against me. However, Judge Boyle did state in transcript that, "If this court did not do something to protect this builder, this woman could put him out of business”. Judge Boyle also said that this builder is not the mafia and is a legitimate businessman. This builder had been engaged in racketeering in 1987. The law suit continued in Chancery Court although my Verified claim was in the Law Division ignored by Mr. Jerchower. The Law Division case went unheard and later unbeknownst to me, was dismissed. These docket numbers were manipulated so that a judge could take control of a claim, rule in favor of a colleague, in spite of the fact that colleague was committing a grotesque fraud upon the unsuspecting general public and the state government.
I have an audio tape of the builder stating that he knows the condos were a health hazard and the conditions could cause a death. Everyone was getting ill and the conditions continued up through the year 2002, concerning a little girl, Tammy. This was just brought to the State Commission of Investigation’s attention though an agent, Marilyn Jakowski and the investigator who is spear heading this report, Charlotte Gaal. Two of the sales agents died and the builder’s superintendent had heart surgery.
In July of 1997, I contracted Legionnaires Disease when I had turned the air conditioner on and breathed in the air that came up from my dining room vent. The level of mold and bacteria was so high, everyone was getting sick, including the builder as he is very allergic to mold. I was treated at Elizabeth Medical Center for the Legionnaires Disease. Once again, Judge Boyle’ s family has a business relationship with the hospital. The family real-estate concern is the leasing agent to the doctors for office space and had performed construction on the newly built additions. This information was confirmed in depositions.
Judge Boyle taught and was counsel to the hospital. Today, Judge Boyle works for the Linderbury McCormick and Esterbrook firm which represents the hospital. At the very time that I was hospitalized, I was summoned into court but could not be present. My attorney, Ephraim Jerchower, asked for a postponement and was denied. Judge Boyle argued that I did not have Legionnaires Disease and would not believe my conditions without proof. He said he was certain that I would not be able to produce documents proving my conditions. Someone at the hospital DID falsify my medical records on a form that states,” falsification of medical information on the form will result in imprisonment”. I have all documents and verified medical records in evidence of the former statements.
After suffering from repeated judicial abuse, Mr. Jershower asked to be relieved from my case and was granted such. For fear of being left pro se, since Judge Boyle gave me no leniency, I was forced to hire an expensive attorney, Eric Goldring, Esq. who I had interviewed sometime earlier. He was referred to me by a mutual friend of both mine and the builder. Looking back, it was foolish on my part, but I had belief in the system and in my case. Before retaining Mr.Goldring, he had contacted the builder’s attorney and the Judge. There must have been a strategy planned between them to keep the issues of Villas on the Park quiet and to get rid of me. About two weeks later, I signed a retainer.
In less than five weeks, Mr. Goldring, the attorney for the builder, and Judge Boyle planned a charade to settle my case by making me believe that I was only mitigating my damages. I never agreed to a final settlement, there was no drafted settlement letter, I signed nothing, I agreed only to sell my unit back to the builder and the litigation would live on, as stated in a letter dated September 16, 1997.
I had fired Mr. Goldring November 14,1997. He was retained on September 30, 1997, in a matter of weeks he took my claim and together with the builder’s attorney, and Judge Boyle, they created a scheme to end this case in fraud. Since there were other defendants involved in this case, it was to be a Global Settlement. In proof of my not agreeing to this sham, the other litigants were still in the case, no one else agreed to settle so the case was virtually not ended until the Judge contrived an order and punishment to end it, ( he was threatening to have a writ of commitment or incarcerate me). My finances were more than stretched after paying attorney fees and fines. I have voluminous documents to prove Mr. Goldring’s history of perjury, misleading statements and negligence.
I denied the settlement and Judge Boyle furthered the rouse by having a Plenary Hearing, to then further impose attorney fees upon me. Finally I retatined Robert Franco, Esq. Even retaining Mr. Franco was a battle, as Judge Boyle prevented me from doing so since Mr. Franco had represented another defendant in the case. Judge Boyle literally tried to make me represent myself by denying council. I wish I had, Robert A, Franco was the worst thing to happen to me in the past ten yesars. He arranged a loan between me and another of his clients, as the client was paying me back Franco was stealing the money. This piece of garbage actually altered a check that was directed to me and put his wife's name over mine and had a third party cash it. Robert A. Franco needs to b disbarred and go to jail.
Judge Boyle ruled against me and forced me into a settlement which I still protest. The final order was for me, to sell my home back to the developer for about the price I paid. To receive fifty five thousand dollars, (on an arbitrary phone call, Judge said I couldn’t have the money because I was not competent enough to have it. It took me several years to finally obtain these funds). I could not contact the Governor’s office, the health departments, my mortgage company and other state offices. He totally obliterated my First Amendment Rights. He also ordered that mutual dismissal would be signed. They were not. All of the above was an issue of fraud, as the Judge defied his own ruling.
In March the builder filed an order to show cause against me for not having sold my house back to him. He came to court armed with letters from the State Health Department (which was not copied to the builder and was further proof of racketeering). The Judge compelled me to stop talking to State Agencies or he will get a writ of commitment against me. I had no mental or medical exams performed. The letters from the State Health Department Stated that they were at my condo and inspected it. They stated they had seen the mold. Another State letter exhibited was from The Planned Real Estate Department compelling the builder to remediate and do further testing before selling any more condos. The builder defied the state and sold several homes within the specified time frame.
The judge continued to threaten me. He made me pay the builder for area carpets which were mine because the builder said my dogs had gotten sick on them. These carpets were already mold contaminated. The judge just extracted every cent that he wanted from me. Again, I was sanctioned with paying the builder's attorney’s fees.
The Appeal
In February of 1999. Mr. Franco filed an appeal before Judges Havey and Lesemann. This appeal perpetuated the court’s charade. The Appeal was decided on March 24, 1999, just a few weeks after it was filed. The court did not notify Mr. Franco of a decision until sometime in October of 1999. After the case was already settled, Mr. Franco was noticed that there would be no oral argument.
The Appellate Court decided not to overturn the lower court’s decision, since, "they did not see a bias on Judge Boyle’s part", and to further the falsehood, they contrived a letter, that does not exist. The court stated,” Plaintiff’s counsel then sent Jampel a letter confirming the settlement and setting out the terms of the agreement”. No such letter exists. Secondly, I had council, so the attorneys would not contact me direct, and to further prove my claim, the builder’s attorney admitted no such agreement exists and he put this in correspondence to Mr. Franco. Mr. Franco asked for clarification from the Appellate Court and was denied.
I recently borrowed the Appellate Case from the Trenton law library. After carefully looking through the microfiche, I saw once again “No Such Letter Exists.”
In May of 2004, after John M. Boyle's retirement, while looking through the court folder, I found a back dated and falsified signed final order.
Mr. Boyle has taken a free pass to act in any manner he wants in the Union County Courthouse,
He has gone on televised lecture tours talking about his involvement with Mafia figures and that he attends cocktail parties with them, boasting of how he is untouchable.
Finding other Litigants
On New Year's day, 2003, I was searching the Internet to find other victims of judicial misconduct and abuse. I did find several who were affected by Judges Boyle and Beglin.
In March of 2005, Mr. Boyle appeared on a major news program talking about how litigants have threatened him because they were dissatisfied with his biased rulings. We contacted the news program and directed them to my website. The news show directed Mr. Boyle to our emails and faxes which alerted him to the stories about him posted on the website. That night my website www.crrol.org was hacked. I was able to trace the hackers and found they are a couple residing overseas who do business with child pornographers and the New Jersey Judiciary.
NORMAN TAUER GIVING DETECTIVE JOHN BURKE A STATEMENT UNDER FREE WILL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
