Defending myself against Robert A. Franco, Esq.

Cynthia Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353

Honorable Judge Allison Accurso
Superior Court of New Jersey
Somerset County Courthouse
20 North Bridge Street
P.O. Box 3000
Somerville, New Jersey 08807

December 17, 2007

Jampel vs. Tauger
Docket Number: SOM-L-481-07

Dear Honorable Judge Accurso,

Initially, I was not going to respond to Mr. Franco’s correspondence of December 12, 2007, but since many of my friends are principled attorneys, I had the opportunity to consult them for a little guidance, as to what is proper as far as defending myself from Mr. Franco’s untruthful assertions.

It is evident that Mr. Franco contradicts his own statements and writes misrepresentations to the Court. He is acting like a person who is drowning and fighting desperately, clutching on to figments of his illusions to gain imaginary footing.

I would like to respectfully bring to the Court’s attention the fact that Mr. Franco is an arm of the Court, and has no compunction about telling transparent and untruthful stories to the Court. This is not a matter of a child telling his mother stories because he was caught stealing another cookie. The Francos are seriously ruining Mr. Tauger’s and my life, not to mention several other’s.

Mr. Franco claims that he has been maintaining Mr. Tauger’s home; he stated he has repaired the deck and has painted the house, but why doesn’t he have the money to pay Mr. Tauger back, or why did he allegedly steal the repayment of funds that was intended for me? Does that not mean that I have a vested interest in the home as well, since my own money was used in some fashion to support the Francos? What Mr. Franco does not understand is, he has a duty to maintain the property, whether he has a vested interest or not. Conversely, if he were to destroy property that he did not own and simply rented, he would be obligated to repair it. The same applies to an auto lease, you must return the vehicle with no damages, no indicative warning lights, proper mileage, etc., all under the proper terms of the lease and common sense. If Mr. Franco does not know this, how can he practice law? Furthermore, I cannot comprehend (as Mr. Franco previously stated in Court on October 12th), how opening a pool and closing a pool is maintenance, that is a luxury, and one that perhaps the Francos should not enjoy, since they have to borrow and pilfer to enjoy it. How would Mr. Franco represent a client, should the shoe be on the other foot.

Mrs. Franco apparently endorsed a check that was meant for me, the check said Cindy, exactly as the three previous checks, and this check in further proof said “check #4” as to it’s intentions. Mrs. Franco spells her name RANDI, the same as she endorsed the back, the face of the check said Cindy, with RANDY written over it. Mr. Franco recently gave Mr. Tauger a check, which he had no qualms about altering, the bank manager allegedly told Mr. Tauger if he needed a witness to the impropriety of Mr. Franco’s actions, she will testify. She also was amazed that this was the action of an attorney.

In short, Mr. Franco simply does not tell the truth and he has his friends, who are of the same element swear to it, hence Mr. John G. Habenstein and his wife. The Francos and the Law Firm of Franco and Franco are a menace to the unsuspecting public. The Ethics Committee maintains that this is a “complex complaint”, which according to the rules may take nine months or more, but the Committee must become aware, the longer it takes for the Committee’s decision, the worse it becomes for the unsuspecting vulnerable public and the justice system itself. I have told this story to several attorneys, Senators and State Officials, they are amazed that nothing has been done in a more timely way, to end this horrible insult to the State Bar.

Sincerely,



Cynthia Jampel

C/c Honorable Yolanda Ciccone
Brian Cige, Esq.
The Interveners, Mr. and Mrs. Robert Franco, Esq.
Norman Tauger
Attorney General, Anne Milgram