IMAGINE, AN ATTORNEY FAILING TO NOTICE THE STATE OF A NOTICE OF TORT
Sunday, May 20, 2007
FROM WAY ACROSS THE POND
From: andrew.zimbler@btopenworld.com
Subject: Re: Note of Appreciation
Date: September 15, 2006 5:30:31 PM EDT
To: fodor@co.somerset.nj.us
Cc: synjam@mac.com
Dear Det. Fodor,
Last Friday, you kindly saw my colleague and friend, Ms Cindy Jampel, and me
when, at my insistence and totally without any appointment, I brought her to
your office to report her fears resulting from the continued threats and
harassment to which she had been subjected for some considerable time.
Although you were clearly extremely busy and would have had every right to
have declined to see us, you kindly, efficiently and courteously both
afforded us your time and then proceeded to offer advice which was both
gratefully received and immediately acted upon.
I am sending this message, a copy of which has been sent to Ms Jampel, to
both thank you most sincerely, man to man, for your exemplary behaviour and
also to ask that, if protocol permits, you forward a copy to your most
senior colleagues as I feel that they should be aware of what a credit you
are to your office.
Ms Jampel has informed me that your colleague, Det. John Burke at your
office, has also been extremely attentive and considerate.
As she is intending to file a strong complaint against Robert Franco with
the ethics committee within the next week, she is particularly appreciative
of the continued support of both of you.
Being a visitor to your country and unaware of the correct procedures, I
felt that it could have been incorrect for me to furnish a copy of this to
your bosses without first checking with you.
However, with your permission, it is my intention to discuss your
outstanding conduct when I have a meeting next week with another of my
associates who holds a very senior security position with the British
Government.
Sir, it was a great honour making your acquaintance, albeit under
challenging circumstances, and I would hope that our paths may cross in the
future in a more relaxed and informal manner.
Yours truly,
Andrew M. Zimbler F.C.A.
ARIZONA CONTINUED
ARBRTATION AWARD
I SAID "BOB, I WANT TO APEAL" HE SAID,"YOU CAN'T" LATER I FOUND "TRIAL DE NUOVO" MEANING GO TO TRIAL.....
WHO LET THE BUCK OUT? WHO GOT THEM?
FRANCO WORKING "HERCULEAN HOURS"
FOR HIS CLIENT WHO SWALLOWED GLASS FROM A DEFECTIVE BOTTLE OF ARAZONA ICE TEA
SHE NEVER RECIEVED A PENNY, YET PAPERS SAY ARBITRATION AWARD AND SETTLED
SPILLING THE BEANS
Dear Sergeant Detective Fodor,
I attempted to send you an email enclosing this follow-up complaint about Robert Franco, Esq. which I sent to the Ethics Committee. The Committee's notion is to stay their investigation until the criminal issues are resolved. Whereas, I believe that your office should and will not leave any unexplored areas open and a thorough investigation takes time, I can't understand why an errant "Attorney" is free to prey upon the unsuspecting, just like he did with the people that you and your office have already taken recorded statements from.
Yesterday, April 27th, Friday, Norman Tauger called me in an upset state and told me that he had just had a conversation with Mr. Franco, where Mr. Franco told him in unequivocal terms, that he is not being investigated in Somerset County. He was arrogant and convincing, and of course, knowing what goes on within the judiciary, nothing will surprise me. Of course, what I see does not belie Mr. Franco's boastful statements. Mr. Franco has conversed with the former Judge, John M. Boyle who is evidenced on a video tape, which I have, talking about his relationship with Mafia figures. Mr. Franco has sought help from Mr. Boyle and referred to it in Ethics papers....what is going on in Somerset County? It is not as if I haven't had enough stolen from me between Judge Gasiorwaski, The DeGuilio Group, the Union County Judiciary and several other turncoat attorneys, why is no one adhering to Title 18? I do not want to put my trust in another lawyer, I want to trust Law Enforcement.
I further realize that there are much greater problems in Somerset County than an attorney who stole $20,000 from a woman, who is preying upon a good-friend, Norman Tauger, gauging attorney fees from whomever is under the gun for a legal issue, etc., but, however, what I do see as emergent is, the issues of two little girls, the Ray sisters, Talia and Ava, being protected and nothing being done about that either .... please, there is far too much of a trail of responsibility for any one to escape guilt at this point. Help those children... documents, pictures, tapes don't lie.... people do. Please acknowledge and validate my concerns.
Again, I respect your time and profession, but don't you truly believe that criminals need to be neutralized? I want to send you evidence of the sexual abuse that is taking place with Ava Ray, a six year old, but I will await hearing from you because the contents are so vile, that even I, an adult am embarrassed. I would hate to have to overcome my embarrassment and take the evidence to the media to expose this but some entity, has got to curtail this neglectful and sinister act of avoidance.
I await your answer.
Respectfully,
Cindy Feiler-Jampel
Begin forwarded message:
From: Cynthia Jampel
Date: April 27, 2007 3:29:37 PM EDT
To: fodor@co.somerset.nj.us
Subject: Robert A Franco
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey
08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353
Attorney Ethics
District X Ethics Committee
Fredric Knapp,Esq.
23 Cattano Avenue
Morristown, New Jersey 07960
(973) 285-1444
RE: X-06-89E
X-06-90E
X-06-91E
X-06-92E
The Law Firm of Franco and Franco
Randi Franco and Robert Franco
April 2, 2007
Dear Mr. Knapp:
I am in receipt of your letter dated March 26, 2007. The contents of the letter simply states the grievances concerning the Law Firm of Franco and Franco has been turned over to the Office of Attorney Ethics, I am assuming that must be a Trenton Office. Please clarify, who is reviewing the case and may I please have contact information.
On another note, in connection with my last letter, I advised that Mr. Franco has a pattern of predatory practices concerning his clients, I was part of a phone conversation which was tape recorded, involving a concerned client telling me the story of Mr. Franco, not too long ago requesting for advance fees because he needed it for cancer treatment. In connection to my previous letter, I know you are familiar with the name Norman Tauger, Mr. Tauger advised that Mr. Franco’s treatment was already performed and covered by insurance. In this conversation, Mr. Tauger and I were both told that Mr. Franco had warned the mother of the client not to tell anyone in the family that he had asked for this money. Mr. Franco knew that if the sister would know this, she would tell Mr. Tauger and the truth would surface.
Mr. Franco’s response to initial complaint
Evidence by tapped conversations
I have been informed that Mr. Franco had been boasting that he has been meeting with a former judge, John M. Boyle for consultation and strategies in defense for the alleged theft, check forgery and Grievance Complaint. I more than believe his covert threats, because he incorporated them in one of his responses, stating that he was going to subpoena Mr. Boyle as a character witness against me. In reference to this threat, Mr. Boyle cannot be a character witness, he can be a material fact witness, which I welcome. This issue should be under further investigation considering that Mr. Franco has contacted the US Attorney’s Office and FBI alleging that Judge Boyle had illicit reasons for his improper ruling in the Matter of Villas on the Park v. Jampel. It is well known that Mr. Boyle’s family is Degnan Boyle Prudential Realtors and that business entity has a relationship with my then adversary.
To further the question of Judge Boyle, he issued a gag order, obstructing fact. This fact was concerning the health and well being of people, relating to the ill health conditions of Villas on the Park. Environmental disclosure is mandated by law. In this particular instance, Mr. Franco was correct, the court obstructed justice and allowed a contaminated site to flourish, as the family of Judge Boyle had a potential for financial profit and gain.
In reflection of Mr. Franco’s boasting about the veil of protection of Judge Boyle, makes perfect sense since the Disciplinary Review Board has two members, John Degnan and Robert Boyle, what is the relationship? By review and name only, there is the appearance of impropriety, coupled with the questionable “untriable status”. My complaint has more than enough ethical substance (putting the alleged criminal issue aside), to compel an “instant investigation”.
I also intend to follow-up with the Matter of RM v. The Supreme Court, to obtain the true meaning of the “Confidential”
inscription across the stationery of your correspondence. Should I find after consulting with Richard Gutman that this is improper, I will consult with Citizens of Justice, John Paff to obtain further redress.
I am looking forward to both your and the Ethics Committee’s
response.
Cordially,
C/c Attorney General Stuart Rabner
Honorable Jon Corzine
HOW PURILE: GROW Up, BOB
SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS @ THE SOMERSET COUNTY PROSTITUTOR'S OFFICE
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
(908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com
Re: Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office Case File #0609-2031
(Robert and Randi Franco)
Dear Wayne Forrest and
Detective Sergeant Fodor,
May 17, 2007
On May 11, I sent several emails and letters to State Offices and State Divisions that oversee crimes and procedures in New Jersey.
Attached to this email is a response from the State Commission Of Investigations stating that my going to the Bridgewater Police was appropriate. Obviously, Detective Fodor, you advised me correctly by sending me to the Police Department to file a complaint. In conclusion, the Executive Director, Alan Rockoff stated that my relief is in prosecution and/ or to proceed in civil remedy, I cannot dispute his impression of this matter, since he is a former Judge.
My concern is what Director Rockoff stated about the prosecutorial part of the advice. That process is not my jurisdiction, it is yours, I will handle the civil end. Your office failed me on the prosecutorial part, just as Mr. Franco said it would, and as I was advised on April 16, by word of mouth for Mr. Franco, ten days prior to the letter you wrote to me with the same out come.
The second concern that I have is, that Excutive Director Rockoff said this is not a systematic issue, I'm not sure about that. I'm beginning to see several patterns. I will be noting them and we will take further action concerning this matter (s).
Sincerely,
Cynthia Feiler- Jampel
From: Cynthia Jampel
Date: May 11, 2007 8:41:13 AM EDT
To: commissioner@dobi.state.nj.us
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
(908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com
I am reporting Robert A. Franco Esq. and Randi Kern Franco Esq. and the Firm of Franco and Franco from 6 Bayer Lane Boonton Township, ( their office is in Morristown) New Jersey for allegedly stealing a total of $20,000 from me. In December of 2004, Robert Franco arranged a loan to another of his clients. Mr. Franco said he would write up the terms but he failed to. I wrote up a quick outline of the loan and wrote in the memo of the check that this loan was referred by Robert Franco, Esq.
The “borrower” had mailed two or three checks to me during the appropriate time but was in default for the full amount. I had called Mr. Tauger a friend of the borrower’s and of Mr. Franco and he became sympathetic and forthcoming with information about the repayment.
The borrower, Larry Goldspeil had defaulted with the loan and spoke with Mr. Tauger and me, admitting that the he had paid back several thousand dollar to me by entrusting cash to Robert Franco, $15,000 instructing him to give it to me in repayment for the loan. Mr. Franco said he was going to use it, then immediately replace it and give to the rightful collector, me.
In the absence of the clear accounting statement that I had been requesting for some time, the borrower and I decided to obtain an accounting of checks, since he informed me the cash was pilfered by Mr. Franco. The borrower had discovered that a check designated to me for five thousand dollars was made payable to CINDY and then written over CINDY was RANDY and endorsed by RANDI FRANCO and then cashed by a third party, Norman Tauger. The check was drawn from a Bank America Account, dated May 6, 2005, consistent with the other checks payable to me. I have copies of the all the checks, bothe the altered and 3 previous checks proving that each check was inscribed only “Cindy” and it was necessary for me to inset my surname.
I also have Mr. Franco on audio tape saying that Randi signed the back of the check and then Mr. Franco went on to threaten me. I filed a complaint at the Bridgewater P.D.
I have two affidavits one from Mr. Goldspeil and the other from Mr. Tauger supporting the money was meant for me.
I would like to meet with someone to present evidence.
A LIST OF ENDEMIC PROLEMS IN SOMERSET COUNTY TO FOLLOW:
1. http://web.mac.com/lray5/iWeb/www.dyfshurts.com/Movie%203.html
2. http://truthwins.info/
3. http://www.truthwins.info/judge-dilts-it-is-apparent-to-me-that-you-are-corruptare-you-not-ashamed-thank-god-
you-are-not-my-father/
4. http://www.crrol.org/JudgeQuits.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
