Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey, 08807
Telephone: (908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com
District X Ethics Committee
23 Cattano Avenue
Morristown, New Jersey 07960
Telephone (973) 285 1444
RE: Law firm of Franco and Franco
Docket No.
X-060089E
March 1, 2007
Dear Mr. Knapp,
Please allow this letter to serve as follow-up to the
numerous letters and phone calls involving my
complaint about the Law Firm of Franco and Franco,
both individually and collectively.
Several months ago, you and I had a brief
conversation, I on my cell phone and you from your
office, which you were about to leave due to an
appointment. I had difficulty hearing you and
unfortunately, because you were leaving your office,
you were unable to call me back on my home phone, so I
could hear more clearly what your intentions were
about the status of my “Grievance Complaint”.
I believe to my best knowledge, you had said you were
moving forward but were going to contact the Somerset
County Prosecutor’s Office to get a clearer
understanding of the criminal investigation against
Robert and Randi Franco and possibly their Law Firm
Franco and Franco. I am still waiting to receive
correspondence from you. Please respond to my question
in letter form, is this matter stayed for this time,
are you investigating further and have you contacted
the Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office?
I have learned from many sources that Robert Franco
has acted adverse toward several of his clients’ best
interest. Unbeknownst to him, through a common
acquaintance, (who is also victimized by the Francos)
I had been introduced to clients and former clients.
Almost unanimously, these clients have asked me about
regaining their funds, which were paid to the Law Firm
of Franco and Franco under the guise of fees.
Mr. Franco’s smooth and cunning practice of gaining
fees has been consistent amongst several of the
clients that have called me. He seems to sweet talk
the potential client into giving him fees but does not
instruct them sign a retainer at that time. He seems
to never bill them or present an accounting of his
work. He did this to me back to the late 1990s when I
was completely naive and trusting. As a matter or
fact, Mr. Franco has a svengali like personality and
has the ability to smile, sweet talk a client and
brutalize them at the same time.
Mr. and Mrs. Franco have used opportunities from time
to time to misguide clients, then, in return, the
clients had to turn to either Mr. or Mrs. Franco for
further legal direction, as the billable time and fees
accrue.
Mr. Franco has talked about the incident concerning
the arrests in Bergen County, but the Bergen County
Detectives already have in their possession audio
taped recordings of Mr. Franco giving me poor and
misleading advice. It appears, he had a vested
financial interest already in mind, as he had given me
adverse and unlawful direction, leaving me vulnerable
to his predatory practices. Either he doesn’t know
what he is doing or he is out right malicious.
I have consulted with at least three criminal defense
attorneys who have told me there are rules concerning
lawyers giving unethical and unlawful advice. I think
perhaps, there may exist a Supreme Court Rule about
attorneys putting clients in imminent
harm.
The Ethics Committee should pursue an investigation
regardless of an impending criminal investigation or
else the Ethics Committee will appear culpable in not
curtailing an unethical and runaway attorney from
practicing law. A criminal investigation could take
years, leaving a wonton attorney to endanger the
public.
Although harm comes from different areas, in this
case, the over the top “life of luxury” and immediate
need for money has forced the Francos to obtain fees
though fraud and deceit.
Please advise if you have contacted the Somerset
County Prosecutor’s Office.
Sincerely,
C/c Attorney General Stuart Rabner
Governor Jon Corzine 
Monday, May 21, 2007
Robin Cohen
Sunday, May 20, 2007
FROM WAY ACROSS THE POND
From: andrew.zimbler@btopenworld.com
Subject: Re: Note of Appreciation
Date: September 15, 2006 5:30:31 PM EDT
To: fodor@co.somerset.nj.us
Cc: synjam@mac.com
Dear Det. Fodor,
Last Friday, you kindly saw my colleague and friend, Ms Cindy Jampel, and me
when, at my insistence and totally without any appointment, I brought her to
your office to report her fears resulting from the continued threats and
harassment to which she had been subjected for some considerable time.
Although you were clearly extremely busy and would have had every right to
have declined to see us, you kindly, efficiently and courteously both
afforded us your time and then proceeded to offer advice which was both
gratefully received and immediately acted upon.
I am sending this message, a copy of which has been sent to Ms Jampel, to
both thank you most sincerely, man to man, for your exemplary behaviour and
also to ask that, if protocol permits, you forward a copy to your most
senior colleagues as I feel that they should be aware of what a credit you
are to your office.
Ms Jampel has informed me that your colleague, Det. John Burke at your
office, has also been extremely attentive and considerate.
As she is intending to file a strong complaint against Robert Franco with
the ethics committee within the next week, she is particularly appreciative
of the continued support of both of you.
Being a visitor to your country and unaware of the correct procedures, I
felt that it could have been incorrect for me to furnish a copy of this to
your bosses without first checking with you.
However, with your permission, it is my intention to discuss your
outstanding conduct when I have a meeting next week with another of my
associates who holds a very senior security position with the British
Government.
Sir, it was a great honour making your acquaintance, albeit under
challenging circumstances, and I would hope that our paths may cross in the
future in a more relaxed and informal manner.
Yours truly,
Andrew M. Zimbler F.C.A.
ARIZONA CONTINUED
ARBRTATION AWARD
I SAID "BOB, I WANT TO APEAL" HE SAID,"YOU CAN'T" LATER I FOUND "TRIAL DE NUOVO" MEANING GO TO TRIAL.....
WHO LET THE BUCK OUT? WHO GOT THEM?
FRANCO WORKING "HERCULEAN HOURS"
FOR HIS CLIENT WHO SWALLOWED GLASS FROM A DEFECTIVE BOTTLE OF ARAZONA ICE TEA
SHE NEVER RECIEVED A PENNY, YET PAPERS SAY ARBITRATION AWARD AND SETTLED
SPILLING THE BEANS
Dear Sergeant Detective Fodor,
I attempted to send you an email enclosing this follow-up complaint about Robert Franco, Esq. which I sent to the Ethics Committee. The Committee's notion is to stay their investigation until the criminal issues are resolved. Whereas, I believe that your office should and will not leave any unexplored areas open and a thorough investigation takes time, I can't understand why an errant "Attorney" is free to prey upon the unsuspecting, just like he did with the people that you and your office have already taken recorded statements from.
Yesterday, April 27th, Friday, Norman Tauger called me in an upset state and told me that he had just had a conversation with Mr. Franco, where Mr. Franco told him in unequivocal terms, that he is not being investigated in Somerset County. He was arrogant and convincing, and of course, knowing what goes on within the judiciary, nothing will surprise me. Of course, what I see does not belie Mr. Franco's boastful statements. Mr. Franco has conversed with the former Judge, John M. Boyle who is evidenced on a video tape, which I have, talking about his relationship with Mafia figures. Mr. Franco has sought help from Mr. Boyle and referred to it in Ethics papers....what is going on in Somerset County? It is not as if I haven't had enough stolen from me between Judge Gasiorwaski, The DeGuilio Group, the Union County Judiciary and several other turncoat attorneys, why is no one adhering to Title 18? I do not want to put my trust in another lawyer, I want to trust Law Enforcement.
I further realize that there are much greater problems in Somerset County than an attorney who stole $20,000 from a woman, who is preying upon a good-friend, Norman Tauger, gauging attorney fees from whomever is under the gun for a legal issue, etc., but, however, what I do see as emergent is, the issues of two little girls, the Ray sisters, Talia and Ava, being protected and nothing being done about that either .... please, there is far too much of a trail of responsibility for any one to escape guilt at this point. Help those children... documents, pictures, tapes don't lie.... people do. Please acknowledge and validate my concerns.
Again, I respect your time and profession, but don't you truly believe that criminals need to be neutralized? I want to send you evidence of the sexual abuse that is taking place with Ava Ray, a six year old, but I will await hearing from you because the contents are so vile, that even I, an adult am embarrassed. I would hate to have to overcome my embarrassment and take the evidence to the media to expose this but some entity, has got to curtail this neglectful and sinister act of avoidance.
I await your answer.
Respectfully,
Cindy Feiler-Jampel
Begin forwarded message:
From: Cynthia Jampel
Date: April 27, 2007 3:29:37 PM EDT
To: fodor@co.somerset.nj.us
Subject: Robert A Franco
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey
08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353
Attorney Ethics
District X Ethics Committee
Fredric Knapp,Esq.
23 Cattano Avenue
Morristown, New Jersey 07960
(973) 285-1444
RE: X-06-89E
X-06-90E
X-06-91E
X-06-92E
The Law Firm of Franco and Franco
Randi Franco and Robert Franco
April 2, 2007
Dear Mr. Knapp:
I am in receipt of your letter dated March 26, 2007. The contents of the letter simply states the grievances concerning the Law Firm of Franco and Franco has been turned over to the Office of Attorney Ethics, I am assuming that must be a Trenton Office. Please clarify, who is reviewing the case and may I please have contact information.
On another note, in connection with my last letter, I advised that Mr. Franco has a pattern of predatory practices concerning his clients, I was part of a phone conversation which was tape recorded, involving a concerned client telling me the story of Mr. Franco, not too long ago requesting for advance fees because he needed it for cancer treatment. In connection to my previous letter, I know you are familiar with the name Norman Tauger, Mr. Tauger advised that Mr. Franco’s treatment was already performed and covered by insurance. In this conversation, Mr. Tauger and I were both told that Mr. Franco had warned the mother of the client not to tell anyone in the family that he had asked for this money. Mr. Franco knew that if the sister would know this, she would tell Mr. Tauger and the truth would surface.
Mr. Franco’s response to initial complaint
Evidence by tapped conversations
I have been informed that Mr. Franco had been boasting that he has been meeting with a former judge, John M. Boyle for consultation and strategies in defense for the alleged theft, check forgery and Grievance Complaint. I more than believe his covert threats, because he incorporated them in one of his responses, stating that he was going to subpoena Mr. Boyle as a character witness against me. In reference to this threat, Mr. Boyle cannot be a character witness, he can be a material fact witness, which I welcome. This issue should be under further investigation considering that Mr. Franco has contacted the US Attorney’s Office and FBI alleging that Judge Boyle had illicit reasons for his improper ruling in the Matter of Villas on the Park v. Jampel. It is well known that Mr. Boyle’s family is Degnan Boyle Prudential Realtors and that business entity has a relationship with my then adversary.
To further the question of Judge Boyle, he issued a gag order, obstructing fact. This fact was concerning the health and well being of people, relating to the ill health conditions of Villas on the Park. Environmental disclosure is mandated by law. In this particular instance, Mr. Franco was correct, the court obstructed justice and allowed a contaminated site to flourish, as the family of Judge Boyle had a potential for financial profit and gain.
In reflection of Mr. Franco’s boasting about the veil of protection of Judge Boyle, makes perfect sense since the Disciplinary Review Board has two members, John Degnan and Robert Boyle, what is the relationship? By review and name only, there is the appearance of impropriety, coupled with the questionable “untriable status”. My complaint has more than enough ethical substance (putting the alleged criminal issue aside), to compel an “instant investigation”.
I also intend to follow-up with the Matter of RM v. The Supreme Court, to obtain the true meaning of the “Confidential”
inscription across the stationery of your correspondence. Should I find after consulting with Richard Gutman that this is improper, I will consult with Citizens of Justice, John Paff to obtain further redress.
I am looking forward to both your and the Ethics Committee’s
response.
Cordially,
C/c Attorney General Stuart Rabner
Honorable Jon Corzine
HOW PURILE: GROW Up, BOB
SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS @ THE SOMERSET COUNTY PROSTITUTOR'S OFFICE
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
(908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com
Re: Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office Case File #0609-2031
(Robert and Randi Franco)
Dear Wayne Forrest and
Detective Sergeant Fodor,
May 17, 2007
On May 11, I sent several emails and letters to State Offices and State Divisions that oversee crimes and procedures in New Jersey.
Attached to this email is a response from the State Commission Of Investigations stating that my going to the Bridgewater Police was appropriate. Obviously, Detective Fodor, you advised me correctly by sending me to the Police Department to file a complaint. In conclusion, the Executive Director, Alan Rockoff stated that my relief is in prosecution and/ or to proceed in civil remedy, I cannot dispute his impression of this matter, since he is a former Judge.
My concern is what Director Rockoff stated about the prosecutorial part of the advice. That process is not my jurisdiction, it is yours, I will handle the civil end. Your office failed me on the prosecutorial part, just as Mr. Franco said it would, and as I was advised on April 16, by word of mouth for Mr. Franco, ten days prior to the letter you wrote to me with the same out come.
The second concern that I have is, that Excutive Director Rockoff said this is not a systematic issue, I'm not sure about that. I'm beginning to see several patterns. I will be noting them and we will take further action concerning this matter (s).
Sincerely,
Cynthia Feiler- Jampel
From: Cynthia Jampel
Date: May 11, 2007 8:41:13 AM EDT
To: commissioner@dobi.state.nj.us
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
(908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com
I am reporting Robert A. Franco Esq. and Randi Kern Franco Esq. and the Firm of Franco and Franco from 6 Bayer Lane Boonton Township, ( their office is in Morristown) New Jersey for allegedly stealing a total of $20,000 from me. In December of 2004, Robert Franco arranged a loan to another of his clients. Mr. Franco said he would write up the terms but he failed to. I wrote up a quick outline of the loan and wrote in the memo of the check that this loan was referred by Robert Franco, Esq.
The “borrower” had mailed two or three checks to me during the appropriate time but was in default for the full amount. I had called Mr. Tauger a friend of the borrower’s and of Mr. Franco and he became sympathetic and forthcoming with information about the repayment.
The borrower, Larry Goldspeil had defaulted with the loan and spoke with Mr. Tauger and me, admitting that the he had paid back several thousand dollar to me by entrusting cash to Robert Franco, $15,000 instructing him to give it to me in repayment for the loan. Mr. Franco said he was going to use it, then immediately replace it and give to the rightful collector, me.
In the absence of the clear accounting statement that I had been requesting for some time, the borrower and I decided to obtain an accounting of checks, since he informed me the cash was pilfered by Mr. Franco. The borrower had discovered that a check designated to me for five thousand dollars was made payable to CINDY and then written over CINDY was RANDY and endorsed by RANDI FRANCO and then cashed by a third party, Norman Tauger. The check was drawn from a Bank America Account, dated May 6, 2005, consistent with the other checks payable to me. I have copies of the all the checks, bothe the altered and 3 previous checks proving that each check was inscribed only “Cindy” and it was necessary for me to inset my surname.
I also have Mr. Franco on audio tape saying that Randi signed the back of the check and then Mr. Franco went on to threaten me. I filed a complaint at the Bridgewater P.D.
I have two affidavits one from Mr. Goldspeil and the other from Mr. Tauger supporting the money was meant for me.
I would like to meet with someone to present evidence.
A LIST OF ENDEMIC PROLEMS IN SOMERSET COUNTY TO FOLLOW:
1. http://web.mac.com/lray5/iWeb/www.dyfshurts.com/Movie%203.html
2. http://truthwins.info/
3. http://www.truthwins.info/judge-dilts-it-is-apparent-to-me-that-you-are-corruptare-you-not-ashamed-thank-god-
you-are-not-my-father/
4. http://www.crrol.org/JudgeQuits.htm
Saturday, May 19, 2007
http://truthwins.info/
http://truthwins.info/
A TRIBUTE TO HEROIC FRIENDS, LARRY, TALIA AND LITTLE AVA
HONORABLE JUDGE JOHN BOYLE
Cindy Jampel
PO box 153
Berkeley Heights, New Jersey 07922
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
970 Broad Street
Suite 700
Newark, New Jersey 07102
Christopher Christie
Investigator Beet
Nancy Manteiga
RE: Former Judge John M. Boyle Union County Courthouse, Elizabeth, NJ
I am alleging that subsequent to former Judge John M. Boyle's appearance on the Fox News Network March 11, 2005, "It's Your World with Neil Cavuto", (and my direction to our website containing transcripts, falsified documents, cancelled checks as payoff and proof of John M. Boyle operating as a criminal enterprise), our website was hacked and this information was removed. I was able to trace that the website was entered at 00.42 AM and the intruders were from Australia, making the time an afternoon hour in Australia. I was able to investigate further to find the hackers have an agreement with some judicial format as well as other sites containing child pornography.
It has been previously reported to your office that Former Judge Boyle boasted about his relationship with organized crime as viewed on a made for TV video. His latest appearance on Fox News outlined mistruths of threats that were made against him. We have well documented evidence that John Boyle has been crying wolf to law enforcement about threats. He is disingenuous and most irregular as a presiding judge. His family stood to have financial gain as framed with in his rulings at the expense of litigants.
Please investigate this complaint. I would like an appointment to present this information in person.
Sincerely,
Cindy Jampel
Robert Franco Admits Wife, Randi endorced the Check on TAPE
AUDIO TAPE WILL BE PROVIDED ON WWW.CRROL.ORG
Acting Governor Richard Codey
Dear Honorable Governor , Richard Codey
May 7, 2007
Attached is a letter that was sent to the Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office. The Prosecutor’s Office had been investigating a clear and unequivocal theft of $20,000 by my former attorney, Robert A. Franco and his wife, Randi Franco, Esq.
There is an audio tape of the attorney himself talking about how a check meant for me was altered and his wife’s name was put on it obliterating and altering mine and then cashed. The attorney kept the money and there was a witness.
The prosecutor has a copy of the check and clear and convincing evidence concerning the theft and the Francos preying on the elderly. Robert Franco has been telling people that he got the investigation shut down because he has connections with the prosecutor’s office.
This crime both from the Attorneys, Robert and Randi Franco and the Prosecutor’s Office need to be investigated by the Attorney General’s Office, I have already filed with the Ethic’s Committee.
Thank you for you kind attention in this matter,
Sincerely,
Cynthia Feiler- Jampel
Robert Franco Claiming the Courts are UNJUST
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353
synjam@mac.com
Somerset County Prosecutor’s Officer
40 North Bridge Street
P.O. Box 3000
Somerville, New Jersey 08876
April 30, 2007
Re: Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office Case File #0609-2031
(Robert and Randi Franco)
Dear Mr. Forrest and
Sergeant Detective Fodor,
I received your letter dated April 26, 2007, much to my discouragement and loss of faith, I understand that your Assistant Prosecutor did not find a criminal prosecution to be warranted concerning the alleged theft by Mr. and Mrs. Franco. I attempted to find out who the Assistant Prosecutor is, who made that determination and had there been an investigation. I believe there was not, since Norman Tauger, Larry Goldspiel nor I, were called in to the victims / witness advocacy. The letter I received is nothing more than a form letter, I received the same one concerning Judge Gasiorwaski another individual who managed to allegedly steal money from me through the guise of another attorney.
YOUR OFFICE HAS DENIED MY DUE PROCESS OF LAW
I am taking notice and I am aggrieved that you and your office have violated: TITLE 18
4. Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
In the late afternoon of April 30, I called the Prosecutor’s Office to find out who the Assistant Prosecutor was, but Sam, the person looking for the name, couldn’t even find the file/ name ”Robert Franco” listed. She asked me if it was a new claim or a juvenile matter. Was there an investigation?
I find it unfathomable that after the clear evidence of the person who directed the check to me, he giving a recorded statement saying that the check was meant for me and then changed to Randy Franco albeit she spells her name Randi ,along with the statement from Norman Tauter stating that Robert Franco set him up to cash the check and then my testimony along with an audio tape of Robert Franco himself addressing the change of the check to Randi, and finally Sergeant Fodor sending me to the Bridgewater P.D. to complain about Mr. Franco, stating a terrorist threat, resulting in the ultimate, the Assistant Prosecutor doesn’t think this rises to a crime, my understanding is diametrically opposing. Why did Sergeant Fodor waste the time of the Bridgewater P.D. if he felt there was no concern ? I think that is a crime in itself.
Wasting police time - section 5(2) Criminal Law Act 1967
(Archbold 28-224)
The offence of wasting police time is committed when a person
0. causes any wasteful employment of the police by
0. knowingly making to any person a false report orally or in writing tending to:
0. show that an offence has been committed; or,
0. give rise to apprehension for the safety of any persons or property; or,
0. show that he has information material to any police inquiry.
It is a summary only offence carrying a maximum penalty of six months' imprisonment and/or a level 4 fine.
Proceedings may only be instituted by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions: s.5(3). Consent may be granted after charge but must be before a plea of guilty is entered or summary trial. Consent must be obtained before proceedings are started by way of summons.
Examples of the type of conduct appropriate for a charge of wasting police time include:
0. false reports that a crime has been committed, which initiates a police investigation;
0. the giving of false information to the police during the course of an existing investigation.
The public interest will favour a prosecution in any one of the following circumstances:-
0. police resources have been diverted for a significant period (for example 10 hours);
0. a substantial cost is incurred, for example a police helicopter is used or an expensive scientific examination undertaken;
0. when the false report is particularly grave or malicious;
0. considerable distress is caused to a person by the report;
0. the accused knew, or ought to have known, that police resources were under particular strain or diverted from a particularly serious inquiry;
0. there is significant premeditation in the making of the report;
0. the report is persisted in, particularly in the face of challenge.
There are statutory offences which involve wasting police time and which should be used instead of section 5(2) when there is sufficient evidence. For example:-
0. perpetrating a bomb hoax - s51(2) Criminal Law Act 1977;
0. false alarms of fire - s.49 Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004;
0. fraudulent insurance claims based on false reports of crime - deception.
There is an overlap between the offence of wasting police time and other, more serious offences. Regard must be had to the factors outlined in General Charging Principles, above in this chapter and Charging Practice for Public Justice Offences, above in this chapter, which help to identify conduct too serious to charge as wasting police time, when consideration should be given to a charge of perverting the course of justice
What rises to the level of a crime in Somerset
County?
I find it very questionable that several weeks prior to receiving Detective Fodor’s letter, Mr. Franco had been telling people he wasn’t even investigated. Why did he know this before I was notified? I am the complainant.
Unless there is a reversal of your initial decision, I feel that his matter should be brought into the public domain by what ever legitimate means there are available. As this is a matter of general domain/ public interest.
Please answer my requests for resolution.
Cordially,
Cynthia Feiler-Jampel
