They are attempting to collect from the Francos too.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
MORE CREDITORS, LOOKING FOR THEIR MONEY FROM THE FRANCOS
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
THIS IS HOW ROBERT A. FRANCO, ESQ. PROTECTED HIS FORMER CLIENT NORMAN TAUGER.....HE USED HIM FOR A MORTGAGE...
RANDI KERN FRANCO, ESQ. WAS THE REPRSENTING ATTORNEY FOR THIS BAD MORTGAGE.....EARLY ON WHO BENEFITTED....THE FRANOCS. NOW THEY CAN WALK AWAY LEAVING TAUGER, HOLDING THE BAG......
THE FRANCOS CLAIM THE HOME IS THEIRS BECAUSE THEY PAY THE MORTGAGE DIRECT....... OR DON'T PAY THE MORTGAGE
Friday, February 22, 2008
ROBERT A. FRANCO, ESQ. and RANDI KERN FRANCO, ESQ further ruin NORMAN TAUGER'S LIFE .
ROBERT A. FRANCO, ESQ. PROMISED TO PAY FOR THE FLOORS THAT NORMAN TAUGER WAS SUED FOR. THE FLOORS ARE IN THE HOME OCCUPIED BY THE FRANCOS. THE MORTGAGE HAS NOT BEEN PAID FOR ABOUT 6 MONTHS.
THE FRANCOS PAY THE MORTGAGE DIRECT (THEY CLAIM THEY OWN THE HOME), THE OUTSTANDING AND PAST DUE COLLECTIONS THAT THE FRANCOS HAVE PROMISED TO PAY TOWARDS THE FLOORS (SEE 3RD PARTY CHECK) HAS NOT BEEN PAID SINCE AUGUST OF 2007.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Sunday, February 3, 2008
www.judicialterrorism.com judge john M. Boyle
^click on link^
Homepage for www.judicialterrorism.com
February 25, 2003
Welcome to the Judicial Terrorism Web Page
Are you having trouble with probate, estate, guardianships, access to public records, or property seizures in probate cases? This may be the website for you. The purpose of this website is to create an awareness of probate problems in the court system nationwide. This website will be updated at least once a month. Scroll down to read "Judges Fight Back Against Common Law Courts," published in Media Bypass in April, 1997. Additional articles written by June Wisniewski will be added monthly.
You can read the article, "Continuing Education Credit Prejudices Judges," published in the Idaho Observer in January, 2001, on this link, http://proliberty.com/observer/20010105.htm .
The mission of this website is to look for peaceful ways to stop the violent, abusive, discriminatory, and illegal tactics of judges in the country, specifically those that were trained by the National Judicial College (NJC) and other training organizations. Judges are trained to confiscate assets of individuals, take away an individual’s rights, put bogus guardianships on individuals, and predetermine trial issues against litigants they dislike.
This website will focus on probate, estate, guardianship issues, access to public records, and property seizure issues. It will feature the probate activities in Union County, New Jersey, the setting of “The Sopranos.” It will also feature the collaboration of the judicial system in Union County, New Jersey, with the local law enforcement. This includes Linden mayor, police commissioner, and convicted felon, John Gregorio, now fined for four separate violations for ethics violations for illegally influencing the government involving the trash-transfer station for garbage disposal. The state Local Finance Board ruled that Gregorio used his influence to help his son-in-law, Dominick Pucillo, the leader of an investment group that owned the land where BFI transfer station planned to build so that they could process most of New York City trash.
Several of us are investigating litigants that have been damaged by several judges and county offices: Judge John Boyle (former Union County judge, now working for Lindabury, Estabrook &McCormick), Union County Assignment Judge Edward Beglin, former Union County Surrogate Ann Conti, Union County Surrogate James LaCorte, any employee from the Union County Surrogate's Office, any problems with Chancery Court in Union County, any problems with attorneys in the law firm of Lindabury, Estabrook & McCormick in Westfield, New Jersey, attorney Walter Kipp of Kipp, Somerville & Kipp in Rutherford, New Jersey, former Judge William Dressel from Colorado, the National Judicial College in Reno, Nevada. If you have had any problems with them, please contact me immediately.
One of the major supporters of NJC is Senator Bill Raggio, who agrees with the activities of NJC. Raggio, as head of the Senate Finance Committee in Nevada, pushed for the State of Nevada to release over six million dollars in state funds to support the activities of NJC since 1997. Senator Raggio represented Frank Sinatra when Sinatra lied to the gaming commission regarding his ties to organized crime in order to get his gaming license back. Raggio, as late as 1999, in a quote in the University of Nevada publication, the Silver and Blue article, “Scoring for Education,” admitted that he was the District Attorney that burned down Joe Comforte’s brothel, and that he would have gotten less heat if he burned down a church. Raggio’s activities are considered perfectly acceptable in the State of Nevada, and it makes one wonder if the rest of the State Senators supported Raggio out of fear as to what might happen to them if they did not support him.
The securities fraud issue involving PaineWebber and their illegal inside trading and substitute of bogus, bankrupt, junk bonds for cash in a brokerage account will be covered. The cooking of books in the Accounting of the Wisniewski probate case involving the stock portfolio scam will also be covered. The two New Jersey family probate cases and the embezzlement and mishandling of the estate assets and property by the New Jersey court system, and the NJC training these judges received will also be covered.
The activities of the non-profit corporation called the National Judicial College will be covered, including their questionable accounting practices, their lack of a state license to operate as a college and offer graduate courses towards a graduate degree in Judicial Studies, their lack of accreditation, their training activities, and their illegal solicitation of funds nationwide.
June Wisniewski and Dorothy Bukowski have been turned down by the Union County Surrogate's Office when they requested access to part of their court files and estate assets in two probate cases, "In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph Wisniewski, Sr." and "In the Matter of the Alleged Will of A. Leo Korona." Assignment Judge Edward Beglin and Surrogate Ann Conti both denied June and Dorothy access to public information. A formal complaint was filed with the Government Records Council, and our records complaint was sent to Kevin Wolfe, Chief, Civil Practice Liaison, Administrative Office of the Courts in early January, 2003, but he had failed to get back with June regarding the court documents she requested. The court document June requested from Assignment Judge Edward Beglin was a MEMO written to him that states her father was killed so that the government could confiscate her father's property. Since Judge Beglin refuses to give June a copy of this document that she read in a public court file, does this make him an accessory to murder after the fact, and responsible for the theft and grand larceny in the amount of over $250,000? The rackeeteering involved Judge Edward Beglin, former Deputy Surrogate Robert Lenahan (who wrote the MEMO), former Union County Surrogate Ann Conti, and former Probate Judge John Boyle. Boyle now works for the law firm that put the bogus guardianship on June so that they could confiscate her probate property, and the guardian is working for the law firm, Lindabury, Estabrook & McCormick, that Boyle now works for. You can link up to them at www.Lindabury.com.
The current Union County Surrogate denied June and Dorothy access to public information in August, 2002, attaching a letter and a court order from Judge Beglin.
Judge John Boyle, Judge Frederick Kentz, and Surrogate Ann Conti were trained by the National Judicial College, and denied June access to her court files and estate assets. A letter was written to the AOC, Robert Lipscher, a teacher at NJC, regarding access to court files in Union County, but he did not respond to June's letter.
The writer of this website, June Wisniewski is available for interviews and public speaking engagements. Her topics are covered in her books that are currently being written or revised:
The Coffin Chasers – An Aggrieved Litigant’s Journey Through The Corrupt World of Probate
(revised edition will be available March 2, 2003)
Unequal Justice – The Inside Story of the National Judicial College
(available May, 2003)
How Organized Crime Controls The Judicial System in Nevada and New Jersey
Free will donations or gifts will be accepted to support the work that June is doing as a freelance investigative journalist. The books will be available for $20 each, including postage.
You can reach June by writing, phoning/faxing, or e-mail:
June Wisniewski
P. O. Box 7291
Reno, Nevada 89510-7291
(775) 324-6856 phone/fax
renojune@judicialterrorism.com
Website will be updated in March, 2003
PRESS RELEASE December, 2002
June Wisniewski
P. O. Box 7291
Reno, Nevada 89510-7291
(775) 324-6856 phone/fax
renojune@judicialterrorism.com
University of Nevada Offers Bogus Graduate Degree for Judges
The National Judicial College (NJC) in collaboration with the University of Nevada, Reno, (UNR) offers an abbreviated, accelerated graduate degree for judges, the Masters of Judicial Studies (MJS) degree. This MJS degree was started in 1986 and the new Ph.D. in Judicial Studies was started in 2001.
The MJS degree, and the Ph.D. degree in Judicial Studies have no external review, and no stamp of approval by the regional accreditation body, the Northwest Association of Schools and Colleges (NASC). The Northwest Association stated in an August 30, 2002, letter that the correspondence of June Wisniewski regarding the Judicial Studies degree program was referred to UNR for consideration.
The National Judicial College (NJC) is a private, unlicensed, unregulated, unaccredited 501 (c) (3) corporation located in Reno, Nevada. NJC trains over 2,000 state judges a year and offers graduate credits that are not recognized as educational credentials or college credits by the Nevada Commission on Postsecondary Education (NCPE). NJC has received over ten million dollars since 1997 from the federal government, the State Justice Institute, and the State of Nevada.
The National Judicial College is not legally licensed to operate in Nevada, to offer graduate credits towards a degree, or advertise that it is involved in offering a graduate degree. NJC does not have a current annual report, but uses a 2001/2002 profile instead. NJC has no external review for any of its courses, and most of the training, course, and conference materials used to train judges and other court personnel are hidden from the public and the press. NJC was never properly founded as a college (see NJ 2002 appellate court decision, Warren County Community College vs. Warren County Board of Chosen Freeholders).
NJC, in collaboration with UNR, offers a shortened, accelerated Masters Degree in Judicial Studies (MJS) for only 12 credits and a journal article, and bypassed the accreditation process for a substantive change as required by the Northwestern Association of Schools and Colleges. NJC, a non-regionally accredited organization, did not file a contractual agreement with UNR to accept or transfer the so-called graduate credits NJC offers from NJC to UNR, to be used towards the MJS degree. A doctorate degree in Judicial Studies was approved by the Board of Regents and is now being offered by UNR, with unlicensed, unaccredited, and unregulated graduate credits being offered by NJC and transferred to UNR for this degree.
NJC does not meet the criteria for UNR graduate credits or a graduate degree program. Only 12 graduate credits are taken from UNR towards the MJS degree. The rest of the so-called graduate credits, taken at NJC, are satisfactory/unsatisfactory, with a magazine/journal article, which is little more than a college term paper, that now meets the requirements for a thesis. The so-called thesis of Judge Janet Berry, which she refers to as an essay, resembles little more than a college term paper with no primary research, only secondary research.
The MJS degree does not follow the same guidelines for course requirements, faculty, and the substantive change process as required for different programs at UNR.
June Wisniewski met with NJC President William Dressel on July 16, 2002. He confirmed that NJC had no license to operate as a college, and felt that NJC did not need a state license. Dressel also said that no tax returns, proof of non-profit status, and audited financial statements were on file in any state where NJC has solicited and currently solicits money. Dressel said, “We don’t send out the 990’s or other financial statements out to other states,” and admitted that he, in his capacity as President of NJC, was breaking the law.
The 990 tax returns, required for non-profit corporations to file with the I.R.S., were finally put on Guidestar in 2003, the website to locate the tax returns of non-profit corporations. The NJC tax returns were not on Guidestar in May, 2002, when June requested these returns so that she could bring them with here to her fellowship on non-profit corporations in Mississippi. A lawsuit could not open the financial records of NJC, as they are judges, and have worked their way around the system on that issue.
NJC has not followed the law in Nevada for licensing and the laws in other states for solicitation of funds, and do not have their records open for public review. NJC has worked their way around the system so that no licensing, accreditation body, the press, or the public can review their financial records or conference/teaching materials without a big confrontation.
NJC Board of Trustees member, Judge Procter Hug, Jr., cancelled an interview June scheduled with him in July, 2002. NJC Board of Trustees chairperson Judge Janet J. Berry failed to respond to phone calls and correspondence, and has a MJS degree from UNR.
NJC solicits money and has failed to follow state laws and file tax returns, financial reports, and proof of non-profit status with the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Alaska, Utah, Arizona, and Florida.
Read the rest of the report in Unequal Justice – The Inside Story of the National Judicial College, available in May, 2003.
June Wisniewski is a freelance investigative journalist and writes articles about probate, estate, and guardianship issues, media constraints, public access issues, judicial training, and judicial corruption. Her first book, “The Coffin Chasers – An Aggrieved Litigant’s Journey Through the Corrupt World of Probate, published in April, 2001, discusses how probate operates in New Jersey. The second edition will be available in November, 2002. This book was instrumental in passing the Access to Public Records Bill on January 8, 2002, which became law on July 8, 2002.
This information is copyrighted. The permission of the June Wisniewski is required before publication of any portion of this website.
Update - December 8, 2002
State of Nevada Gives A Special Interest Group $450,000 for Fund Raising Activities
The State of Nevada is giving $450,000 annually to a special interest group called the National Judicial College (NJC) according to Senate Bill No. 437, approved by the Legislature in 2001. NJC is a private, non-profit, 501(c) (3) corporation. NJC stated on their testimony at the 2001 legislative session that the money would be used for fund raising purposes, and for scholarships for out-of-state judges. When asked for a breakdown of their income and expenditures, per NRS 1.470, as required by law, they refused to comply. NJC is demanding an excessive amount of money, and is not being held accountable by the Governor, the Nevada State Legislature, or the Senate Finance Committee on how the money is actually being spent.
The money that is being allocated to NJC is being used for frivolous purposes, including entertainment expenses. The Fleischmann Foundation criticized NJC for not giving a breakdown of their entertainment expenses, and the I.R.S. sued the American Bar Association for money allocated to NJC.
The money allocated to NJC can be reverted back to the State of Nevada, and can be used to keep the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR), campus open from December 21, 2002, to January 5, 2003. Over 1,000 UNR classified employees are being forced to make up for time lost due to the proposed campus closure, and over 10,000 UNR students are being inconvenienced by the proposed college closure, when there is money available to keep UNR open. The student employment fund is also being cut back because of the so-called lack of funding. The citizens of Nevada should not be forced to finance NJC, a special interest group with a hidden agenda that does not meet the needs of this state.
UNR says that there is no money left to keep the lights in the parking lots on after 11 p.m., even though the library is open until midnight five nights a week. If a students get assaulted, they can file a complaint against the UNR president because he is aware that there is money appropriated for NJC that can be used towards critical services, such as the student escort services after hours, and to keep the lights on at night.
Please contact Governor Kenny Guinn at (775) 684-5670, or by fax at (775) 684-5683, or by e-mail at his home page at http://gov.state.nv.us/contact.htm or by mail at Capitol Building, Carson City, Nevada 89701, and ask him to revert back to the State of Nevada the money that is being set aside for NJC, and use it to keep the UNR campus open and keep the UNR student jobs.
NJC is the special interest group that Senator Bill Raggio supports. You can contact him at (775) 786-5000, or (775) 684-6500, or wraggio@sen.state.nv.us or senate@lcb.state.nv.us or fax at (775) 323-8534 and ask him to revert the NJC funding back to the State of Nevada and to UNR.
Update - December 8, 2002
The National Judicial College is in violation of state law per NRS 394. The fines for violating the licensing laws of the Nevada Commission on Postsecondary Education is $2,500 per day for each violation. Each day in violation of the licensing laws is a separate violation. Since the National Judicial College has been in violation of three separate state laws since 1986, for over 16 years, the fines that the State of Nevada could collect from NJC would wipe out their entire assets, which are about seventeen million dollars. This money can be used towards the University of Nevada Medical School budget, towards keeping the university campus open during the winter break, towards student employment, and for other programs to help the citizens of Nevada.
Over six million dollars was given to NJC by the State of Nevada since 1997, with a push from Senators Raggio and Rawson to give this organization public funds. This money is being used towards a corporate welfare program to support a frivolous training program that trains judges secretly, without any public access, to rule on cases against the public, without the knowledge and consent of the public. If you are in litigation with a judge, find out whether if he or she attended NJC. If they did, you may have a cause of action against the National Judicial College for the type of training that is being used against you in your court cases. Contact June Wisniewski at (775) 324-6856, or at renojune@judicialterrorism.com for further information. If NJC has damaged enough litigants, this may be a cause for a class action suit against NJC. This private, secret organization with no external review should not be supported with public funds from Congress, the State Justice Institute, or the State of Nevada.
Check out this site here for further updates and articles published by June on judicial training. Here is an interesting article about the Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators, the top legal leaders in each state and how they feel about litigants who represent themselves in probate and family courts.
Friday, February 1, 2008
IS THIS WHAT EFFECTED YOUR BUDDY'S INCOME?
NOW, YOU STATE IN COURT THAT YOU WENT TO VISIT MR. BOYLE? FOR WHAT PURPOSES, MR. FRANCO? THIS WAS YOUR ALLEGED ADVERSARY, YOU TOLD ME THAT VILLAS ON THE PARK WAS A HEALTH HAZARD AND THE TRIAL WAS A SHAM, THAT THESE PEOPLE WERE CRIMINALS, DIDN'T YOU?.... BEFORE WITNESSES.....DO YOU KNOW WHAT A CRIMINAL IS?
.jpg)
OR WAS IT THIS?
Saturday, January 26, 2008
YES, BERGEN COUNTY HAS SEVERAL TAPES...ALL OF YOUR HUSBAND...I STILL HAVE THE COPIES...yes for the right time....
HOW MUCH WAS BEING PAID FOR THIS FAVOR?
WHY WAS I LEFT OUT OF THIS EMAIL? BECAUSE IF I HAD KNOWN, I WOULD HAVE REPORTED IT, BUT ACCORDING TO THIS EMAIL, BOB PERPETUATED IT......LET'S TALK ABOUT BERGEN COUNTY.....
THERE'S MORE TAPES OF YOUR HUSBAND THAN WATERGATE HAD....
Friday, January 25, 2008
RANDI KERN FRANCO, ESQ.
Attached to this email are two documents;
1. Larry Goldspeil's sworn statement to your office about how he became aware of Robert Franco, Esq. Goldspeil was stating that Bob Franco did some closings for him and he needed legal advice. Paperwork obtained through OPRA
2. Stationery letterhead stating that Randi Franco is licensed in New York and Robert Franco is licensed in New Jersey. Mr. Franco is not licensed in New York yet he represented and gave legal advice to Larry Goldspeil, a New York resident. The house closing was in New York, it was attended by Norman Tauger and Tauger will attest that Robert Franco was there representing
Goldspeil, not Randi Franco.
Cindy Jampel.
Yes, my family's home..... yes 6 Bayer Lane, yes as proven today, January 25, 2008...120 days MORTGAGE IN THE AREARS....YES, MY HOUSE....YES I OWE NORMAN TAUGER OVER $100,000 YES MY HOUSE!
BY THE WAY...WHY DON'T YOU DO A BLOG ABOUT ME?
DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT THE GOVERNMENT RECORDS COUNCIL IS?
THE GOVERNMENT RECORDS COUNCIL AFFORDED ME TO SEE HOW YOU FRIENDS REPORTED YOUR PILFERING AND CORRUPT ACTIVITIES..... PREYING ON THE VULNERABLE, USING OTHER'S CREDIT CARDS, TAMPERING WITH THE ATTORNEY ESCROW ACCOUNT, ILLEGAL WIRE TAPPING, PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE.... FORGETTING TO NOTIFYING THE STATE ABOUT A TORT CLAIM...... RUNNING TO JUDGE DILT'S SECRETARY.... FILING FALSE POLICE REPORTS, COERCING FRIENDS TO FILE STALKING COMPLAINTS WHILE I WAS SAFELY PUNCHED IN AT MY JOB... REMEMBER WHEN I LOANED YOU $10,000....THERE ARE NO WORDS FOR YOU........ COLITIS PERSONIFIED.....
HERE'S AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT OPRA HELPED ME GARNER


Saturday, January 19, 2008
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
FILED WITH SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Cynthia Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Norman Tauger
XXXXSxxxxx Way Superior Court Of New Jersey
XXXXXXX, New Jersey Somerset County Superior Court
070XX Law Division
Telephone: (XXX) XXX xx00
Docket No:L-481-07
Civil Action
Cynthia Jampel
Plaintiff, pro se
Certification
v. In Support to Remove the
Norman Tauger Stay and Enforce the Original
Defendant, pro se Judgment and to return the
Money that was Improperly
Converted by the Interveners
v.
The Interveners;
Robert A. Franco, Esq.
And Randi Kern Franco,Esq.
I, Cynthia Jampel, of full age, certify and state to the following:
1. I am the Plaintiff in the matter of Jampel v. Tauger and a Co-Defendant in the matter captioned, an Order to Show Cause, seeking emergent relief filed on behalf of Robert A. Franco, Esq. and Randi K. Franco, Esq. otherwise known as the Interveners.
1.On October 12th, 2007, the plaintiff Jampel, the Defendant Tauger and the Interveners Mr. and Mrs. Franco, Esq. appeared before the Honorable Judge Allison Accurso. Judge Accurso asked the Interveners to state what they can offer to convince the Court, that they have a vested interest in the property of 6 Bayer Lane Boonton Township, New Jersey, 07005; they could not state a valid or supportive proof as to their financial investment in the home, separate from ordinary or rental purposes. Mr. Franco stated the following, along with other vacuous claims;
Franco stated,
“I open, close and pay the maintenance on the pool”.
The truth is; The Francos owe Tauger approximately $130,000, most of which, was used to pay the exorbitant mortgage payments, that are habitually in the arrears. Tauger owes Jampel $115,000 plus interest, therefore any equity the Francos claim, is what they had deceptively borrowed from Tauger and pilfered from Jampel.
Franco also stated,
“The mortgage was originated with a “CREDIT” given as a down payment by the sellers.”
Therefore again, no money was contributed from the Franco’s pocket, albeit, had they put money down, it would void the mortgage commitment. A down payment cannot come from an outside source or be borrowed.
Do the Franco’s have a vested interest in this home ?
No, they do not.
The mortgage is an interest only libor. Interest only, no equity, particularly concerning the manner in which the Francos pay. The Francos have fallen grossly behind with the payments and are in imminent danger of foreclosure. The taxes and insurance are inclusive in the ordinary payment, but since the monthly installments are so far behind, this put the property and Tauger in further jeopardy. (Exhibit A).
The home is deeded solely to Mr. Tauger.
The mortgage is exclusively in his name.
It has been noted that nowhere on the formal mortgage papers does the Franco name appear, except for Randi Franco, Esq., as an representing attorney (Exhibit B). The Francos induced Tauger into taking a mortgage for them, they arranged for fraudulent certifications and official papers to misrepresent income and assets for Tauger. Mrs. Franco represented him in a deceptive and predatory manner, so that both Mr. and Mrs. Franco could benefit.
Together they destroyed Tauger’s credit. They borrowed money from him to maintain their life of luxury and now they are the cause of Tauger’s inability to live his life, without the jeopardy of arrests and his own finances to retain Counsel to represent him. (Exhibit C). Tauger actually had written an outline of the hurtful and damaging events that the Francos caused, and then ended it by saying “Incarceration is not enough”. This outline was written on the Franco’s professional stationery, then faxed to Jampel in evidence that Jampel had no persuasion or coercion over Tauger’s actions. The ultimate is that Tauger is willing to take a polygraph to show how victimized he really is from this rouge team. The mortgage was deceptively originated, masterminded by the Francos. Presently the mortgage is not being paid as agreed by Tauger in theory, this is theft by deception but nowhere, does Robert A. Franco, Esq.’s name appear. In Exhibit C, Tauger himself expressed,
“ I must now sell the house,
they cannot keep paying….”
The Francos have breeched their professional duty, by inducing Tauger to agree to a fraudulent mortgage. This is the same practice as Mr. Franco perpetrated, when he induced Jampel into loaning money to his New York client, [*1] Larry Goldspiel, knowing the client would pay her back through his law firm; and he would then have the opportunity to convert the money to himself or his wife for purposes to enrich their lifestyle. (Exhibit D, check Randi).
2.Upon appearing before this Court, Robert A. Franco, Esq. brought fraud upon the Court by deceptively stating the status of Tauger’s mortgage. The Francos were at the time late, and are consistently late with their payments, incurring over $3,200 in charges as interest and penalties, diminishing the equity of Tauger’s home. Furthermore, should the Francos pay in a timely way, (which they believe would give them ownership of the home), it is stated within the mortgage commitment papers, that the mortgage cannot be transferred (Exhibit E). Hence, Mr. Tauger has the control of the property, since the home is a direct connection to the mortgage. Tauger has stated, that he wishes to sell the property and settle his debt. This has been noted by Tauger and written by his Court appointed Attorney, Brian Cige. Letter, December 12th 2007. (Exhibit F).
3. On January 3, 2008, Tauger and Jampel tape-recorded a conversation with Customer Service of Countrywide Mortgage.
During the conversation Mr. Tauger became shocked and sickened by the news that,
*1Robert Franco is not licensed in NY
“The Francos had not paid the “first mortgage” since August of 2007, nor the “second mortgage” since July of 2007”. The payments are in the arrears and Tauger had been sent a Notice of Forclosure. The amont due is about $80,000.
4. Mr. Tauger was mortified but continued the conversation, giving an update of his present income and living expenses to Customer Service. This was very concerning, because the fraud department is already aware of the background of this mortgage. The Francos are presently and were under investigation with the Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office for Theft by Deception, primarily for converting $20,000 tended for Jampel and for other reasons as well. (Exhibit G Goldspiel and Tauger Cert.)
5. After speaking with Countrywide, Tauger called Mrs. Franco, she was most annoyed and curt with him. She kept repeating over and over, “Why would you call Countrywide and alert them?” As if Tauger had no right to discover that he could be arrested for defaulting on the defective mortgage; or at best, discovering that the Francos had forged Tauger’s signature many times, which would ultimately relieve him of his tragic involvement with this mortgage. (Exhibit H, postscripts).
Mrs. Franco also stated,
“Don’t worry we have a plan, there is a plan to the madness, I promise you.”
What Mrs. Franco didn’t know, Jampel also had a plan, she sent all the information to Law Enforcement. Tauger went on to suggest to Mrs. Franco that they could be saving money on the side to abscond.
6. During another phone call, Mrs. Franco said that she is aware that Brian Cige, Esq. at Tauger’s request, is going to prepare a motion to sell the home. Mrs. Franco started to gnaw at Tauger’s vulnerability when she said,
“Now I’ll have to look for an apartment for my kids and us, to live in”.
Tauger does not have the heart to be proactive so he therefore takes the passive role, such as having a lie detector test administered by law enforcement or police, or have his sister fight for him and seek a Court Appointed Attorney perform the “dirty work”. He is obviously afraid of the Francos, which was evident from his testimony on October 12, 2007. Tauger went so far as to show the Court that claimed he is demented, so he would not appear to be responsible for the outcome, yet Tauger is adamant about selling the property. After the Court appearance on the 12th, Jampel’s cell phone was connected to Tauger’s, the attacks from the Francos at Tauger, was overheard by five people.
7. In February of 2006, the Francos needed $7,000 urgently. Once again, they were falling behind with their mortgage payments. They took it from their Attorney Trust Account and demanded that Tauger give $7,000 to them, to replace the removed funds. Mr. Tauger gave the money to the Francos and was never repaid. Tauger felt the urgency to help out, because the attorney for the other party was threatening to sue his friend, Larry Goldspiel, for the return of his client’s money. Tauger filed a complaint with the Watchung Police Department, stating Franco deceptively converted $7,000 from him. (Exhibit I, Exhibit C)
8. In 2006 and 2007, I had learned from reading the testimony given at the Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office, how money that was owed to Jampel and others was embezzled and converted, while the Francos were circumventing paying income taxes. (Exhibit J).
9. To date, the Francos have intervened and stopped the collecting of Jampel’s Judgment. They have hampered Jampel from collecting a debt that is long overdue, and now, I am in jeopardy of losing my home and other possessions. The Francos have put Jampel in the arrears about $25,000 by converting $20,000 of her money, as repayment, and along with restricting Tauger from paying her, by both not paying Tauger and stopping the sale of his home.
They have frivolously caused a delay of listing and selling the property, possibly causing the equity and value to become greatly reduced. The Francos should be held responsible for their actions and be accountable to pay for all losses that the victim Jampel has suffered with, and from. They should be compelled to return the funds they had embezzled in order to perpetuate their life of fraud and titillating pleasures, while Jampel and Tauger are simply attempting to satisfy simple responsibilities and obligations.
Jampel is working excessive hours, attempting to recoup from the damages, brought upon her by the lush, yet deceptive lifestyle and dishonest professional practice of her former attorneys, Mr. and Mrs. Robert Franco, Esq. Jampel and her ill pets have been victimized by ruthless attorney predatory practices from the Francos, for self-enrichment purposes.
For the above stated reasons, the temporary stay on the lien and judgment: Judgment J 222045-07
JUDGMENT FOR MONIES OWED AND FOR SALE OF
PROPERY
must be lifted and removed. The lien on the property of 6 Bayer Lane Boonton New Jersey, 07005 must be enforced, and all money ($20,000), (plus applicable interest and sanctions, deemed by the Court), along with punitive damages, must be paid to the Plaintiff by the Interveners within thirty days of the signed Order.
I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the foregoing statements are false, I am subject to punishment.
Dated ________________ ___________________
Cynthia Jampel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
