^click on link^
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Monday, March 31, 2008
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Saturday, March 29, 2008
DEAR GOOGLE,
IF I AM HURT, INCAPACITATED, COMPROMISED OR KILLED, WILL THIS BLOG REMAIN ON GOOGLE FOR ETERNITY?
Friday, March 28, 2008
GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY....ARE WE JOKING?
I BET AT LEAST 32 DAZE WERE SPENT DREAMING UP THESE VERY DIFFICULT AND UNINTELLIGIBLE QUESTIONS...HERE'S YOUR ANSWERS.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
A FEW ANSWERS TO THE INTERROGATORIES
CLICK ON LINK ABOVE TO HEAR ABOUT THE ESCROW ACCOUNT
ATTACHED ARE A FEW DOCUMENTS IN MY POSSESSION. THEY REPRESENT QUESTIONS 10 AND 11.
THE DOCUMENTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES, JUST AS CHECK #143 DID.... ACTUALLY, MR. FRANCO SPOKE FOR IT
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Monday, March 24, 2008
Sunday, March 23, 2008
Saturday, March 22, 2008
MY SON LARRY........
CAN YOU GET ANYTHING RIGHT? EVEN IF IT'S TO YOUR BENEFIT......
Tape takes about a minute to load...but worth it!
Friday, March 21, 2008
THERES NO HARASSMENT HERE. TRY TO HAVE SOME WILL POWER
STOP GOOGLING YOUR NAME.
I GUESS YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO, in order TO ANSWER THE INTERROGATORIES,
PARTICULARLY NUMBER:
38. Did you ever take money that was intended for Ms. Jampel, to use for your own purposes?
What happened with a $5,000 check that
had payment #4 in the memo line issued
from Eric Goldspeil, that was originally
intended for Cindy?
Who changed Cindy to Randy?
Where were you when this change
was made?
Who endorsed the back of the check?
Did you see this check posted on Ms.
Jampel’s Blog?
Thank you, GOOGLE!
SHOULD AUDIO TAPE RECORDINGS NOT BE ADMISSIBLE IN COURT, THANKS TO MR. ROBERT A. FRANCO BRINGING MY BLOG INTO THE MATTER, THE TAPES CAN BE LISTENED TO AS MP3 RECORDINGS RIGHT ON THE BLOG.........SO IN ESSENCE THE BLOG IS NOW MATERIAL EVIDENCE.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
HELLO, MR FRANCO,ESQ. YOU'RE NOT A PARTY TO THIS ACTION,BUT I'M SO HAPPY THAT YOU SUBPOENAED MY BANK ACCOUNT...
IT ONLY PROVES THAT ONE OF US IS NOT A LIAR
CAN YOU EVER TELL THE TRUTH?
Cynthia Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Brian Cige, Esq
7 East High Street
Somerville, New Jersey
08876
Norman Tauger
8301 Summit Way Superior Court Of New Jersey
Watchung, New Jersey Somerset County Superior Court
07069 Law Division
Telephone: (908) 393 4300
Cynthia Jampel
Plaintiff, pro se
V.
Norman Tauger
Defendant, pro se
Re: Docket No: L-481-07
March 15, 2008
Dear Honorable Judge Accurso,
The undersigned is Plaintiff, pro se in the above referenced matter.
Since the last appearance before the court on February 1, 2008, defendant Norman Trauger was named, with others including the undersigned, as a party defendant in a foreclosure suit instituted by the Bank of New York, et al. Attached please find a copy of the foreclosure complaint with no mention of Robert and Randi Kern Franco as an interested parties other than, at best, a veiled reference to an “unknown tenant.”
Mr. Franco’s entry into this matter was driven by his assertions to the court that his close relationship with Mr. Trauger spawned a contractual interest in the subject property and that the undersigned’s alleged interest in the property which resulted in a judicial lien ordered and since stayed by this court, was the work of misrepresentation and manipulation.
Because of Mr. Franco’s close association with Mr. Trauger, it is reasonable to believe that Mr. Franco received a copy of the foreclosure complaint from his friend. If, indeed, Mr. Franco has a bona fide interest in the subject property, now is the time for Mr. Franco to re-enter the instant litigation and also advise the plaintiff bank in the foreclosure suit.
Finally, it would appear that the two matters should be consolidated for judicial expediency. As a pro se litigant, I’m not sure who has the obligation to apply for consolidation.
Respectfully submitted,
Cynthia Jampel
Cc: Robert Franco, Esq (by certified mail)
55 Madison Ave.
Morristown, New Jersey
07960
Brian Cige, Esq
7 East High Street
Somerville, New Jersey
08876
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
