LETS'S GROW UP TO BE LAWYERS..Let's GET ICE CREAM FIRST and WATCH SOAP OPRAS FOR NOW

THE SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR NEVER RELEASED RANDI KERN FRANCO FROM THE INVESTIGATION

CALLING ALL 5 YEAR OLDS......CAN ANY OF YOU SEE WHERE ROBERT A. FRANCO ESQ PROVES HE HAS A VESTED INTEREST IN NORMAN TAUGER'S HOME?

LET ME SEE...SOMERSET COUNTY PROSTITUTOR =" TYPE 0"
"WESTED INTEREST" YEP, THAT'S WHAT HE HAS A WESTED INTEREST! AIN'T THAT THE TRWTH!

PEOPLE DON'T KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF ME? THIS IS WHAT YOUR BEST FRIEND SAYS OF YOU!





DO I SEE ESCROW ACC? SURE DO $7,000

Defending myself against Robert A. Franco, Esq.

Cynthia Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353

Honorable Judge Allison Accurso
Superior Court of New Jersey
Somerset County Courthouse
20 North Bridge Street
P.O. Box 3000
Somerville, New Jersey 08807

December 17, 2007

Jampel vs. Tauger
Docket Number: SOM-L-481-07

Dear Honorable Judge Accurso,

Initially, I was not going to respond to Mr. Franco’s correspondence of December 12, 2007, but since many of my friends are principled attorneys, I had the opportunity to consult them for a little guidance, as to what is proper as far as defending myself from Mr. Franco’s untruthful assertions.

It is evident that Mr. Franco contradicts his own statements and writes misrepresentations to the Court. He is acting like a person who is drowning and fighting desperately, clutching on to figments of his illusions to gain imaginary footing.

I would like to respectfully bring to the Court’s attention the fact that Mr. Franco is an arm of the Court, and has no compunction about telling transparent and untruthful stories to the Court. This is not a matter of a child telling his mother stories because he was caught stealing another cookie. The Francos are seriously ruining Mr. Tauger’s and my life, not to mention several other’s.

Mr. Franco claims that he has been maintaining Mr. Tauger’s home; he stated he has repaired the deck and has painted the house, but why doesn’t he have the money to pay Mr. Tauger back, or why did he allegedly steal the repayment of funds that was intended for me? Does that not mean that I have a vested interest in the home as well, since my own money was used in some fashion to support the Francos? What Mr. Franco does not understand is, he has a duty to maintain the property, whether he has a vested interest or not. Conversely, if he were to destroy property that he did not own and simply rented, he would be obligated to repair it. The same applies to an auto lease, you must return the vehicle with no damages, no indicative warning lights, proper mileage, etc., all under the proper terms of the lease and common sense. If Mr. Franco does not know this, how can he practice law? Furthermore, I cannot comprehend (as Mr. Franco previously stated in Court on October 12th), how opening a pool and closing a pool is maintenance, that is a luxury, and one that perhaps the Francos should not enjoy, since they have to borrow and pilfer to enjoy it. How would Mr. Franco represent a client, should the shoe be on the other foot.

Mrs. Franco apparently endorsed a check that was meant for me, the check said Cindy, exactly as the three previous checks, and this check in further proof said “check #4” as to it’s intentions. Mrs. Franco spells her name RANDI, the same as she endorsed the back, the face of the check said Cindy, with RANDY written over it. Mr. Franco recently gave Mr. Tauger a check, which he had no qualms about altering, the bank manager allegedly told Mr. Tauger if he needed a witness to the impropriety of Mr. Franco’s actions, she will testify. She also was amazed that this was the action of an attorney.

In short, Mr. Franco simply does not tell the truth and he has his friends, who are of the same element swear to it, hence Mr. John G. Habenstein and his wife. The Francos and the Law Firm of Franco and Franco are a menace to the unsuspecting public. The Ethics Committee maintains that this is a “complex complaint”, which according to the rules may take nine months or more, but the Committee must become aware, the longer it takes for the Committee’s decision, the worse it becomes for the unsuspecting vulnerable public and the justice system itself. I have told this story to several attorneys, Senators and State Officials, they are amazed that nothing has been done in a more timely way, to end this horrible insult to the State Bar.

Sincerely,



Cynthia Jampel

C/c Honorable Yolanda Ciccone
Brian Cige, Esq.
The Interveners, Mr. and Mrs. Robert Franco, Esq.
Norman Tauger
Attorney General, Anne Milgram

GETTING IN TOUCH WITH REALITY

THIS SHOULD CARRY A LOT OF WEIGHT

2003-07-07 -- Habenstein, Jr., John -- Sentencing -- News Release

Somerset Man Sentenced to One Month Imprisonment for Making False Statements About Impending Terrorist Attack

NEWARK- A Somerset man was sentenced to one month imprisonment today for making false statements to federal law enforcement officers concerning alleged terrorist activities, U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie announced.

U.S. District Judge William G. Bassler also ordered John Habenstein, 32, to serve five months house arrest with electronic monitoring and three years supervised release after he is released from prison. In addition, Habenstein must pay a $2,000 fine.

At his plea hearing before Judge Bassler in February 2003, Habenstein admitted that he contacted the FBI in April and May 2002 claiming to have information concerning a terrorist attack that was about to take place in the United States. Habenstein also admitted that, in a series of discussions with FBI agents, Habenstein stated that he had learned that weapons of mass destruction were heading to the United States and Canada on two ships that had originated in the Middle East and were sailing under the flag of Liberia.

Habenstein admitted that he lied about the identity of the source of the information, who he initially claimed to be a high-ranking military official in the United Arab Emirates. Habenstein admitted that that and other information he provided was false, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Boxer.

Habenstein, who owned Intellecom Inc. in Hillsborough, which, he said, specialized in military and political intelligence, also provided information concerning possible dates and locations at which the weapons might be detonated, according to Habenstein's original criminal complaint.

As set forth in that criminal complaint, Habenstein admitted to the FBI that his information came from Internet sources, but he was not able to identify those sources. Habenstein further stated that he had lied in an attempt to gain favor with the FBI so that the FBI would assist him in his business venture.

Substantial law enforcement resources were mobilized in the United States and in Canada in response to Habenstein's initial statements. Efforts by law enforcement officers included boarding and searching a ship in Savannah, Ga. and in Newark, N.J. in search of the alleged weapons of mass destruction. No such weapons were found.

Christie credited Special Agents of the FBI, under the direction of the Special Agent in Charge Louie F. Allen, with developing the case.

The Government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Boxer, of the U.S. Attorney's Terrorism Unit, in Newark.

-end-

Defense Counsel: George Yusca, Esq. Lawrenceville

NUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTS

ROBERT FRANCO ESQ. AND RANDI FRANCO, ESQ.

Sanity at last!

ROBERT FRANCO ESQ. AND RANDI FRANCO, ESQ.

ROBERT FRANCO, ESQ. AND RANDI FRANCO, ESQ.

Cynthia Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353

Honorable Judge Allison Accurso
Superior Court of New Jersey
Somerset County Courthouse
20 North Bridge Street
P.O. Box 3000
Somerville, New Jersey 08807

December 11, 2007

Jampel vs. Tauger
Docket Number: SOM-L-481-07

Dear Honorable Judge Accurso,

I am in receipt of Mr. Franco’s correspondence that was sent to the Court on behalf of the Interveners, Robert A. Franco, Esq. and Randi Kern Franco, Esq.

It is apparent that Mr. Franco, along with his inability to contract with truth, is so ensconced with fear that he is reaching extremes to convince the Court that he should stop me from collecting a debt that is long overdue. Mr. Franco is partially responsible for the tardiness in repayment because, as the Court is already aware, Mr. Franco allegedly pilfered much of the proceeds, which the original borrower had entrusted Mr. Franco with. The borrower gave him, our attorney, Mr. Franco, Esq., the funds to give to me, but unfortunately Mr. Franco, Esq. simply kept the money for himself, this was in evidence by two certifications and a copy of the altered check, endorsed by Randi Kern Franco and later blindly cashed by Norman Tauger.

Mr. Tauger and I, are very amicable about the debt and pending lien on his Boonton property. Mr. Tauger and I, are both horribly victimized by the Francos through their unconscionable and ruthless manner of taking what is not theirs. Mr. Tauger feels the only way he will get the money the Francos owe him, is to sell the home, and hopefully the value of the property has escalated. In financial terms, the Francos have not contributed to true equity, since the mortgage is interest only. The only valid vested interest the Francos have, is in Mr. Tauger and the debt that is owed to him, which is well in excess of $100,000. To further demonstrate the irresponsibility of the Francos, they have let the deck and other parts of the home to deteriorate, Mr. Tauger told this to me in complete disgust.

I had attended only one meeting with the Court appointed attorney, Mr. Cige, and that was at Mr. Tauger’s request. It was simply explained to Mr. Cige that Mr. Tauger and I are both suffering because the Francos have taken our money, along with a list of other client’s fees that Mr. Franco had solicited and then abandoned. There are several Complaints that have been sent to the Ethics Committee and more to follow. These Complaints in effect may well put the Francos’ licenses in jeopardy, again leaving Mr. Tauger exposed. Mr. Tauger must sell the property for his own safety, as he unequivocally wishes to do,

Since October 12th, due to Mr. Franco’s relentless acts of retaliation, my employment was put in jeopardy because, the State Police came to interview me, concerning the convoluted Certification prepared by Rebecca Habenstien with the alleged instruction of Mr. Franco, Esq. This deranged scheme was an effort to have me arrested, by stating that I attempted to assassinate a former judge. For days before the report was sent to the State Police, Mr. Franco was bragging to Mr. Tauger, “Wait until you see what happens to her now, she’s [Cindy Jampel} is getting arrested”. The Detectives were so taken back by this horrifying story that they allegedly took it past the prosecutor at their office in attempt to indict Mr. Franco and Mrs. Habenstein. The trail of Mr. Franco’s actions have now filtered throughout, and my only source of vindication is through my website, which contains nothing in effect about Judge Dilts. My website displays nothing more than public documents and letters prepared by Mr. Franco himself, attacking the Judiciary and his own complaints about the former Judge John Boyle’s deceit.

The actions of Mr. Franco, acting again as an intervener into the Ray Family Matter, by attempting to speak to Judge Dilts speaks volumes. What right does he hold in running to a Judge to speak to him about something that does not concern the messenger? This is the action of a scared, desperate and petulant child. How could Mr. Franco say such mistruths knowing there were several witnesses, Mr. Tauger, Mr. Cige and myself? How can these attorneys be permitted to practice law and be part of the State Bar?
These are the questions that fall under the parameters of my alleged fantasies about New Jersey, according to Mr. Franco.

I intend to write to the Assignment Judge, the Honorable Judge Yolanda Ciccone, about carrying on where the Somerset County Prosecutor left off; the convening of a Grand Jury investigation into the Law Firm of Franco and Franco. Mr. and Mrs. Franco have violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, RPC 8.4 Misconduct, over and over again, as well as other Rules. The emotional stability of this law firm should be in question since the future and lives of individuals are in their control.

On Tuesday, I had a brief conversation with Mr. Cige concerning Mr. Tauger and his desire to sell the property. In an effort to keep expenses and the matter simple, we would request all considerations into selling the home.

Thank you in advance for all your considerations.

Respectfully,

Cynthia Jampel

C/c Honorable Yolanda Ciccone
Brian Cige, Esq.
The Interveners, Mr. an Mrs. Robert Franco, Esq.
Norman Tauger
Attorney General, Anne Milgram


SO DO YOU THINK WE DON'T KNOW WHO ANONYMOUS IS: YOUR MIDDLE NAME IS SCHMUCK, YOU USED THE WORD ALL THE TIME AND YOU'RE A PARASITE

Robert and Randi Franco, Esq

HURT THE MAN WHO WAS "'LIKE A FATHER TO ME"

THE CHECK WAS ALTERED BY ROBERT FRANCO

TRUTH IS STRANGER THAN FICTION

NOTICE! RANDI IS SPELLED WITH AN "I"

FRANCO SAID, "I PREPARED A DEED IN MY NAME, BUT I DIDN'T FILE IT"

TOO BAD TAUGER HAD NEVER AGREED TO IT!



WHY DOESN'T FRANCO GET A MORTGAGE IN HIS NAME?

NORMAN TAUGER'S STATEMENT OF FACT

CAUGHT

From: synjam@mac.com
Subject: Law Firm of Franco and Franco / James Nobile
Date: October 27, 2007 6:11:52 PM EDT
To: nancy.manteiga@usdoj.gov, thomas.mahoney@us.mac.com, ralph.marra@usdoj.gov, senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov, SenAdler@njleg.org
Cc: markgelman@aol.com, reg590@gmail.com, thomas_caggiano@yahoo.com, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, tculpepper@erols.com, hicaliber2002@aol.com, beddi9@aol.com, brew22ster@optonline.net, batu@att.net, Ang1344@aol.com, ashaseagreen@yahoo.com, taffyrice@mindspring.com, pcastora@xpressamerica.net

Cynthia Feiler Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Telephone (908) 393 9353

U.S. Attorney’s Office
790 Broad Street
Suite 700
Newark, New Jersey 07102
Telephone (973) 645 2700


Dear Mr. Nobile, Chief of Special Prosecutions,

Copy to:
Honorable U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie,

I am attaching two letters, one sent May 3, 2005, from you to the undersigned, sent about the same time that I and Steven Fine had a meeting with you at the Newark Office. The other sent October 1, 2007, from Mr. Robert Franco to you, referencing me.

1. To recap the letter that you had sent me, the crux of the letter was concerning the hacking of my website, www.crrol.org and the evidence that the New Jersey Judiciary, was one of the last entities that entered the site, before the hacking by judeandchris.com, an outfit that appears to do business with pedophiles.

2. When we met, I was complaining about improper and alleged criminal acts, that were committed by a former judge. I had asked you to seize my court file. My complaint was about the judges and as it relates to CRRoL. It was rather amazing that all the material that was removed, was relative to the former Judge John M. Boyle, of Union County.

3. At the end of our meeting, you asked me if you were to obtain my court folder, would I stop complaining about judges. It seems that as your question sounded a bit unusual, or like something else, you didn't seize my folder and I have not stopped complaining about criminal acts in New Jersey.

4. Now, presently, enters the mix of Mr. Franco's letter. If you did make these statements to him, then you have been deluding me all along. If you did not, then Mr. Franco is guilty of submitting slanderous and false material to the court......which is it, and what has the FBI uncovered about the perverted entity that has hacked CRRoL? (7th entry down in stats counter)

5. Perhaps, what you meant in your commentary to Mr. Franco is, " it's too bad that since your involvement with Ms. Jampel, she has caught you red handed!"


Cordially,

Cynthia Feiler Jampel

Heating Up

Sexual harassment lawsuit targets ex-Gov. DiFrancesco
Lawyer from his firm claims improper firing
Thursday, October 25, 2007
BY JOSH MARGOLIN AND ROBERT SCHWANEBERG
Star-Ledger Staff
A lawyer who claims she was sexually harassed by former Gov. Donald DiFrancesco and fired from his law firm when she "blew the whistle" on bad behavior by a municipal judge filed suit against the firm yesterday.

DiFrancesco called the allegations "absolutely false."


The civil suit was filed in Essex County by Michele D'Onofrio, 48, a single mother of four who lives in Warren Township and served as its municipal prosecutor. She claims she was fired last month "in retaliation" for filing a judicial ethics complaint against a local judge after being warned not to do so.

The lawsuit says D'Onofrio had learned that Warren Township Municipal Court Judge Richard Sasso was "inebriated" on the bench and had abused his powers. It claims Assemblyman Christopher "Kip" Bateman (R-Somerset), a partner in the firm, warned her not to file a complaint.

D'Onofrio contends that during her six years at the firm, she was "regularly subjected to unwelcome and sexist comments and advances by Donald DiFrancesco" and "experienced a pattern and practice of sex discrimination."

Reached last evening, DiFrancesco, 62, said: "Let me just say this: Kip and I are public figures so we're easy targets. This person was asked to take her business elsewhere -- not just by me, but by the owners of our business for business reasons. What she's alleging is absolutely false, both as to myself and as to Kip. It's just a matter of trying to collect."

Efforts to reach Sasso last evening were unsuccessful.

The lawsuit alleges that at a meeting of the League of Municipalities in Atlantic City, "DiFrancesco asked plaintiff to stay an extra night in his suite and to attend a Beach Boys concert with him. Plaintiff refused."

DiFrancesco said his wife, Diane, was with him at the Atlantic City convention and he was only trying to be nice by offering D'Onofrio and his other partners the chance to use an extra room in their suite.

He declined to comment on any of the other accusations, on the advice of his attorney.

The lawsuit also claims that shortly before D'Onofrio underwent reconstructive surgery this month following a double mastectomy, DiFrancesco made inappropriate remarks about how she would look afterward.

It also alleges the firm has no female partners and recently held a golf outing for male employees only.

"It's 2007. Who has a men-only firm outing? You kidding me?" said Nancy Erika Smith, the Montclair lawyer who is representing D'Onofrio.

"Other women have complained about the conduct and I can prove it," Smith said. "Once in a while, you get these big shots who think that this little girl, who is nobody, can't stand up to them. That's how they treated her. It's been awful."

Smith said she filed the lawsuit in Essex County because D'Onofrio had brought her concerns to some Superior Court judges in Somerset County who "are going to be witnesses."

THE NAKED TRUTH WILL BE OUT

JUSY LIKE THE THE INTERLOPERS

DO YOU MEAN I'M NOT NORMAN TAUGER?

or Cindy