HITTING THE ICEBERG

SELF SERVING

MOTIVATION

NARCISSISM

THE MORTGAGE WAS UP TO DATE BECAUSE FRANCO ALLEGEDLY USED THE MONEY HE STOLE WHICH LARRY GOLDSPEIL HAD GIVEN HIM.THAT MONEY WAS INTENDED FOR C JAMPEL. ON A TAPE RECORDED CONVERSATION FRANCO SAID THE NAME WAS CHANGED FROM CINDY TO RANDY AND RANDI SIGNED THE BACK (SEE THE CHECK). HE ALSO SAID THAT HE TOOK THE MONEY BECAUSE LARRY GOLDSPEIL OWED IT TO HIM..... GOLDSPEIL HAD ALREADY PAID HIM...... THE LEGAL MATTER WAS NEVER RESOLVED AND IS STILL PENDING.....IN ESSENCE FRANCO GOT PAID TWICE FOR AN INCOMPLETE JOB.....THE SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR HAS A COPY OF THE EVIDENCED TAPE OF THE CONVERSATION WHERE FRANCO ADMITTED TAKING THE MONEY.

WHAT? No Victims in June

What? NO VICTIMS IN JULY?

NORMAN TAUGER, A MAN WITHOUT A CAR OR BANK ACCOUNT....

LET ME SEE, I CAN TURN CINDY INTO RANDY WITH A (Y), THEN I CAN DUPE NORMAN INTO CASHING THE CHECK..... I CAN SIMPLY LAUGH AT HIS JOKES...

BY THE TIME SOMEONE FIGURES THIS OUT, THE MORTGAGE WILL BE PAID.....THEN I HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT NEXT MONTH...HMMMMM, LET ME SEE THE MORTGAGE IS ABOUT $11,000 A MONTH, THE HUMMER IS ABOUT $700 A MONTH ....THE USED JAG IS...... I CAN DO THAT!

TYPICAL BILLING (OVER)

FRANCIS X HERMES IS A AN ACCOMPLISHED ATTORNEY AND FORMER PROSECUTOR. HE REPRESENTED ROBERT A. FRANCO IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED THEFT OF THE ALTERED CHECK AND STOLEN FUNDS......HMMMM FORMER PROSECUTOR....

ROBERT A. FRANCO, ESQ. COULD NOT BE SMARTER!

LET ME SEE, I'LL DO A SEARCH ON "CINDY JAMPEL AND JUDGE THOMAS DILTS (THE INTERNET= TRUTH)
HANDBAGS ,TRAVEL, HMMMMM A CINDY DILTS HANDBAG?????? HONEY, SHALL I BUY ONE FOR YOU? NORMIE, CREDIT CARD PLEASE!

OKAY, ACTUAL AND TRUE DOCUMENTS = TRUTH! AS SEEN ON THIS BLOG

LETS'S GROW UP TO BE LAWYERS..Let's GET ICE CREAM FIRST and WATCH SOAP OPRAS FOR NOW

THE SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR NEVER RELEASED RANDI KERN FRANCO FROM THE INVESTIGATION

CALLING ALL 5 YEAR OLDS......CAN ANY OF YOU SEE WHERE ROBERT A. FRANCO ESQ PROVES HE HAS A VESTED INTEREST IN NORMAN TAUGER'S HOME?

LET ME SEE...SOMERSET COUNTY PROSTITUTOR =" TYPE 0"
"WESTED INTEREST" YEP, THAT'S WHAT HE HAS A WESTED INTEREST! AIN'T THAT THE TRWTH!

PEOPLE DON'T KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF ME? THIS IS WHAT YOUR BEST FRIEND SAYS OF YOU!





DO I SEE ESCROW ACC? SURE DO $7,000

Defending myself against Robert A. Franco, Esq.

Cynthia Jampel
3308 French Drive
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
Phone: (908) 393 9353

Honorable Judge Allison Accurso
Superior Court of New Jersey
Somerset County Courthouse
20 North Bridge Street
P.O. Box 3000
Somerville, New Jersey 08807

December 17, 2007

Jampel vs. Tauger
Docket Number: SOM-L-481-07

Dear Honorable Judge Accurso,

Initially, I was not going to respond to Mr. Franco’s correspondence of December 12, 2007, but since many of my friends are principled attorneys, I had the opportunity to consult them for a little guidance, as to what is proper as far as defending myself from Mr. Franco’s untruthful assertions.

It is evident that Mr. Franco contradicts his own statements and writes misrepresentations to the Court. He is acting like a person who is drowning and fighting desperately, clutching on to figments of his illusions to gain imaginary footing.

I would like to respectfully bring to the Court’s attention the fact that Mr. Franco is an arm of the Court, and has no compunction about telling transparent and untruthful stories to the Court. This is not a matter of a child telling his mother stories because he was caught stealing another cookie. The Francos are seriously ruining Mr. Tauger’s and my life, not to mention several other’s.

Mr. Franco claims that he has been maintaining Mr. Tauger’s home; he stated he has repaired the deck and has painted the house, but why doesn’t he have the money to pay Mr. Tauger back, or why did he allegedly steal the repayment of funds that was intended for me? Does that not mean that I have a vested interest in the home as well, since my own money was used in some fashion to support the Francos? What Mr. Franco does not understand is, he has a duty to maintain the property, whether he has a vested interest or not. Conversely, if he were to destroy property that he did not own and simply rented, he would be obligated to repair it. The same applies to an auto lease, you must return the vehicle with no damages, no indicative warning lights, proper mileage, etc., all under the proper terms of the lease and common sense. If Mr. Franco does not know this, how can he practice law? Furthermore, I cannot comprehend (as Mr. Franco previously stated in Court on October 12th), how opening a pool and closing a pool is maintenance, that is a luxury, and one that perhaps the Francos should not enjoy, since they have to borrow and pilfer to enjoy it. How would Mr. Franco represent a client, should the shoe be on the other foot.

Mrs. Franco apparently endorsed a check that was meant for me, the check said Cindy, exactly as the three previous checks, and this check in further proof said “check #4” as to it’s intentions. Mrs. Franco spells her name RANDI, the same as she endorsed the back, the face of the check said Cindy, with RANDY written over it. Mr. Franco recently gave Mr. Tauger a check, which he had no qualms about altering, the bank manager allegedly told Mr. Tauger if he needed a witness to the impropriety of Mr. Franco’s actions, she will testify. She also was amazed that this was the action of an attorney.

In short, Mr. Franco simply does not tell the truth and he has his friends, who are of the same element swear to it, hence Mr. John G. Habenstein and his wife. The Francos and the Law Firm of Franco and Franco are a menace to the unsuspecting public. The Ethics Committee maintains that this is a “complex complaint”, which according to the rules may take nine months or more, but the Committee must become aware, the longer it takes for the Committee’s decision, the worse it becomes for the unsuspecting vulnerable public and the justice system itself. I have told this story to several attorneys, Senators and State Officials, they are amazed that nothing has been done in a more timely way, to end this horrible insult to the State Bar.

Sincerely,



Cynthia Jampel

C/c Honorable Yolanda Ciccone
Brian Cige, Esq.
The Interveners, Mr. and Mrs. Robert Franco, Esq.
Norman Tauger
Attorney General, Anne Milgram

GETTING IN TOUCH WITH REALITY

THIS SHOULD CARRY A LOT OF WEIGHT

2003-07-07 -- Habenstein, Jr., John -- Sentencing -- News Release

Somerset Man Sentenced to One Month Imprisonment for Making False Statements About Impending Terrorist Attack

NEWARK- A Somerset man was sentenced to one month imprisonment today for making false statements to federal law enforcement officers concerning alleged terrorist activities, U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie announced.

U.S. District Judge William G. Bassler also ordered John Habenstein, 32, to serve five months house arrest with electronic monitoring and three years supervised release after he is released from prison. In addition, Habenstein must pay a $2,000 fine.

At his plea hearing before Judge Bassler in February 2003, Habenstein admitted that he contacted the FBI in April and May 2002 claiming to have information concerning a terrorist attack that was about to take place in the United States. Habenstein also admitted that, in a series of discussions with FBI agents, Habenstein stated that he had learned that weapons of mass destruction were heading to the United States and Canada on two ships that had originated in the Middle East and were sailing under the flag of Liberia.

Habenstein admitted that he lied about the identity of the source of the information, who he initially claimed to be a high-ranking military official in the United Arab Emirates. Habenstein admitted that that and other information he provided was false, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Boxer.

Habenstein, who owned Intellecom Inc. in Hillsborough, which, he said, specialized in military and political intelligence, also provided information concerning possible dates and locations at which the weapons might be detonated, according to Habenstein's original criminal complaint.

As set forth in that criminal complaint, Habenstein admitted to the FBI that his information came from Internet sources, but he was not able to identify those sources. Habenstein further stated that he had lied in an attempt to gain favor with the FBI so that the FBI would assist him in his business venture.

Substantial law enforcement resources were mobilized in the United States and in Canada in response to Habenstein's initial statements. Efforts by law enforcement officers included boarding and searching a ship in Savannah, Ga. and in Newark, N.J. in search of the alleged weapons of mass destruction. No such weapons were found.

Christie credited Special Agents of the FBI, under the direction of the Special Agent in Charge Louie F. Allen, with developing the case.

The Government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Boxer, of the U.S. Attorney's Terrorism Unit, in Newark.

-end-

Defense Counsel: George Yusca, Esq. Lawrenceville

NUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTSNUTS

ROBERT FRANCO ESQ. AND RANDI FRANCO, ESQ.

Sanity at last!

ROBERT FRANCO ESQ. AND RANDI FRANCO, ESQ.